Cobain Comments - Answer Overflow

  async rateLimitedCallApi<T>(url: string, schema: Type<T>): Promise<T> {
    await this.rate_limiter.acquire();

    const response = await fetch(url, this.request_data);
    if (!response.ok) {
      throw Error(`Invalid request: ${response}`);
    }

    const json = await response.json();
    const parsedResponse = schema(json);

    if (parsedResponse instanceof type.errors) throw parsedResponse;

    return parsedResponse as T;
  }

  async rateLimitedCallApi<T>(url: string, schema: Type<T>): Promise<T> {
    await this.rate_limiter.acquire();

    const response = await fetch(url, this.request_data);
    if (!response.ok) {
      throw Error(`Invalid request: ${response}`);
    }

    const json = await response.json();
    const parsedResponse = schema(json);

    if (parsedResponse instanceof type.errors) throw parsedResponse;

    return parsedResponse as T;
  }

13 replies

Aarktype

•Created by Cobain on 9/20/2024 in #questions

Use native ts type

Right I was doing that but and by default TS considered it string, doing what Dimava suggested makes this union of string literals that I wanted, thanks!

5 replies

HHono

•Created by Cobain on 9/9/2024 in #help

Multiple platforms, same project

I might as well use turborepo for this

7 replies

HHono

•Created by Cobain on 9/9/2024 in #help

Multiple platforms, same project

I hope is not confusing lol

7 replies

HHono

•Created by Cobain on 9/9/2024 in #help

Multiple platforms, same project

7 replies

Aarktype

•Created by Cobain on 9/6/2024 in #questions

Represent the File class

right thanks

23 replies

HHono

•Created by Cobain on 9/9/2024 in #help

Multiple platforms, same project

Ok thanks will try it

7 replies

Aarktype

•Created by Cobain on 9/6/2024 in #questions

Represent the File class

great thanks, also if i have to validate an object which has lots of keys, but i only want to validate it has the ones im interested in, is there a way to do like a "partial validation"?

23 replies

Aarktype

•Created by Cobain on 9/6/2024 in #questions

Represent the File class

Ok I ended doing that. When I access later a type declared in the scope doing types.example, the typing of example doesn't only include itself but all the other scope data, but will only validate the first part right? here:

const Coin: Type<{
    id: string;
    symbol: string;
    description?: string;
    image_url?: string.url;
}, {
    id: string;
    coin: {
        id: string;
        symbol: string;
        description?: string;
        image_url?: string.url;
    };

const Coin: Type<{
    id: string;
    symbol: string;
    description?: string;
    image_url?: string.url;
}, {
    id: string;
    coin: {
        id: string;
        symbol: string;
        description?: string;
        image_url?: string.url;
    };

23 replies

Aarktype

•Created by Cobain on 9/6/2024 in #questions

Represent the File class

Ok, thanks for the quick response

23 replies

Aarktype

•Created by Cobain on 9/6/2024 in #questions

Represent the File class

Right ok, yeah probably gonna think about the performance side as the main reason i'm trying to switch from Zod is this

23 replies

Aarktype

•Created by Cobain on 9/6/2024 in #questions

Represent the File class

Another unrelated question, is there a way to reference to another type's attributes when declaring a new type? something like this:

/** The Token entity */
export const Token = type({
  id: "string",
  symbol: "string",
  "description?": "string",
  tickers: Ticker.array(),
  "image_url?": "string.url"
})

/** A candle of a coin in a point in time */
export const Candle = type({
  coin_id: Token.id
})

/** The Token entity */
export const Token = type({
  id: "string",
  symbol: "string",
  "description?": "string",
  tickers: Ticker.array(),
  "image_url?": "string.url"
})

/** A candle of a coin in a point in time */
export const Candle = type({
  coin_id: Token.id
})