Opt Comments - Answer Overflow

Topics

Opt

•Created by Opt on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

Last minute chem doubts

...the exam is tomorrow.

19 replies

•Created by Opt on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

Last minute chem doubts

@iTeachChem sorry for the ping but could you help with the second doubt?

19 replies

•Created by hardcoreisdead on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

hydrocarbons

Triple bonded carbon is very electronegative. The hydrogen attached to it barely shares any of the electron density, and thus, can be donated as a proton

14 replies

•Created by hardcoreisdead on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

hydrocarbons

RMgX → R(-) R(-) + H(+) → RH

14 replies

•Created by hardcoreisdead on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

hydrocarbons

Grignard reagent with a proton donating species gives you the hydrocarbon corresponding to Grignard reagent

14 replies

•Created by hardcoreisdead on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

hydrocarbons

Both the OH and the ≡CH donate a H(+)

14 replies

•Created by hardcoreisdead on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

hydrocarbons

Mb, terminal alkyne, so two moles of H(+) per mole reagent

14 replies

•Created by hardcoreisdead on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

hydrocarbons

So you get the original compound again

14 replies

•Created by hardcoreisdead on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

hydrocarbons

It has an alcohol group so just a proton donor

14 replies

•Created by vj25_ on 4/3/2025 in #💭│doubts

binomial

k = 0 to 100 is a weird bound

12 replies

•Created by Nimboi [ping if answering] on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Structure of atom/modern phy, De-Broglie wavelength in atomic orbit

That's weird

33 replies

•Created by Nimboi [ping if answering] on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Structure of atom/modern phy, De-Broglie wavelength in atomic orbit

Oh

33 replies

•Created by Nimboi [ping if answering] on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Structure of atom/modern phy, De-Broglie wavelength in atomic orbit

And r = n²a_0/Z

33 replies

•Created by Nimboi [ping if answering] on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Structure of atom/modern phy, De-Broglie wavelength in atomic orbit

2πr = nλ

33 replies

•Created by Gamertug on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Heat loss

So just bundle it up and say 'entropy hogaya'

51 replies

•Created by Gamertug on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Heat loss

Lot of stuff

51 replies

•Created by Gamertug on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Heat loss

There's also polarisation loss, induction loss, dissipation of fields is always going to happen, magnetic field generation loss

51 replies

•Created by Gamertug on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Heat loss

It's actually always gonna be there, but we don't want to complicate stuff so we say heat loss

51 replies

•Created by Gamertug on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Heat loss

Circuit has some "implicit resistance"

51 replies

•Created by Gamertug on 4/2/2025 in #💭│doubts

Heat loss

Heat loss + induction effort actually, but the latter is considered negligible compared to former

51 replies