brunomgmateus Comments - Answer Overflow

brunomgmateus

•Created by Bobakanoosh on 9/21/2024 in #❓・help

i18n language auto detection not working

Are you using "prefix_except_default" strategy? There's currently a pending issue that may be affecting you. https://github.com/nuxt-modules/i18n/issues/3039

5 replies

NNuxt

•Created by AngeloK on 9/19/2024 in #❓・help

@nuxt/fonts adobe

In your case, may be 'Ador-Hairline' instead of 'ador-hairline'?

8 replies

NNuxt

•Created by AngeloK on 9/19/2024 in #❓・help

@nuxt/fonts adobe

You may need to type the font name with uppercase, as in the adobe fonts name. Like this:

  fonts: {
    families: [
      {
        name: 'Mulish',
        display: "swap",
        weights: [400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900],
        provider: 'google'
      },
      {
        name: 'IvyPresto-Display',
        weights: [100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700],
        provider: 'adobe'
      }
    ],

    adobe: {
      id: ['xxx123']
    },
   }

  fonts: {
    families: [
      {
        name: 'Mulish',
        display: "swap",
        weights: [400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 900],
        provider: 'google'
      },
      {
        name: 'IvyPresto-Display',
        weights: [100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700],
        provider: 'adobe'
      }
    ],

    adobe: {
      id: ['xxx123']
    },
   }

8 replies

NNuxt

•Created by brunomgmateus on 9/18/2024 in #❓・help

Is it possible to exclude a component from a cached route?

Thank you. I assumed that, but I'm also guessing that, being a fairly used scenario, there would be some way of bailing some components from cache. Thanks anyway (happy that it wasn't a dumb question 🙂

4 replies

NNuxt

•Created by brunomgmateus on 9/18/2024 in #❓・help

Is it possible to exclude a component from a cached route?

@danielroe Sorry for pulling you in, but would you think that: a. this is a bug of the module? b. this could be an enhancement for nuxt core? c. I'm just a d*mbass and it should be done in a different fashion?

4 replies

NNuxt

•Created by DeVoresyah on 8/2/2024 in #❓・help

Build Nuxt 3 as CommonJS

You just need to disable the "experimental.writeEarlyHints" in nuxt config. SHould work well

11 replies

NNuxt

•Created by Mike on 5/15/2024 in #❓・help

How to host a full stack Nuxt3 app on cPanel

Sorry for the late reply. You can host it, but there's a couple of pre-requisites. This github discussion has more details. https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/discussions/25910#discussioncomment-10396305

5 replies

NNuxt

•Created by DeVoresyah on 8/2/2024 in #❓・help

Build Nuxt 3 as CommonJS

This was true for the latest Nuxt version.

11 replies

NNuxt

•Created by DeVoresyah on 8/2/2024 in #❓・help

Build Nuxt 3 as CommonJS

Sorry for the late reply, but just to let you know that I've come accross an issue where, if you're using the setting "experimental.writeEarlyHints" in nuxt.config.ts, it breaks production version in cPanel, Plesk (and other serverrs that use either nginX or Phusion Passenger).

11 replies

NNuxt

•Created by DeVoresyah on 8/2/2024 in #❓・help

Build Nuxt 3 as CommonJS

and so far has been working. But on Nuxt 3.11

11 replies

NNuxt

•Created by DeVoresyah on 8/2/2024 in #❓・help

Build Nuxt 3 as CommonJS

I've also tried just loading:

// appstart.cjs
import('./.output/server/index.mjs')

// appstart.cjs
import('./.output/server/index.mjs')

11 replies

NNuxt

•Created by DeVoresyah on 8/2/2024 in #❓・help

Build Nuxt 3 as CommonJS

App used to work fine until nuxt 3.11.x. Then somehow something changed, not quite sure what. I've usually had it working with a loading script, appstart.cjs.

 async function loadApp() {
  await import("./.output/server/index.mjs")
}

loadApp()

 async function loadApp() {
  await import("./.output/server/index.mjs")
}

loadApp()

This usually would load, but now it doesn't...

11 replies

NNuxt

•Created by DeVoresyah on 8/2/2024 in #❓・help

Build Nuxt 3 as CommonJS

Would love to know more about this, having the same issue,

11 replies

NNuxt

•Created by QRST on 7/25/2024 in #❓・help

Quick Question - Supabase Client Fetch vs API route fetch

It should be the same result AFAIK, but to me using server api brings a better workflow, as it becomes easier and cleaner to handle as the project increases in size. Not only fetching logic becomes separated, but the data fetching is actually done on the server side, instead of possibly exposing the fetched resource server on the client and possibly CORS errors (but it can also be mitigated with 'server: true' when fetching directly). Defining allowed methods is also a breeze, as is the whole api structuring. Also, if you would like to access that data from other apps, or php, etc, you would just point it to the endpoint. However, pay attention to securing your api, as I've seen the wild endpoints that delete stuff from database without any protection. Just something to be aware of.

2 replies

NNuxt

•Created by Gendarme on 7/25/2024 in #❓・help

API route errors

https://nuxt.com/docs/guide/directory-structure/server#catch-all-route

8 replies

NNuxt

•Created by Gendarme on 7/25/2024 in #❓・help

API route errors

seems correct. But shouldn't it be [id].delete.ts?

8 replies

NNuxt