Kuba
Explore posts from serversAarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/7/2025 in #questions
Stanard Schema issues conformance
No problem! 😃 That sounds promising, looking forward to the release of it, but no pressure with the timeline here
15 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/7/2025 in #questions
Stanard Schema issues conformance
Hey @ArkDavid, I have an update. It was decided with the Tanstack maintainers that instead of stringifying the errors with JSON, it might be a better approach to extract the message and path, which the spec guarantees to be present on
Issue.
It's motivated by the though that if any of validation libraries has non-serializable issues, then utilizing just the mentioned fields avoids this issue altogether.
I felt that this thread put a bit of unnecessary urgency on you to prioritize the toJSON support. From the perspective of Tanstack libraries this shouldn't be as critical anymore in the nearby future, so there’s no need to prioritize it as highly as we initially thought.15 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/7/2025 in #questions
Stanard Schema issues conformance
It's true that the standard doesn't say anything about the serialization. Until now I though that all errors are serializable, but I didn't ever account that error can have references to itself. Of course don't take it as offence or critique, it more an interesting observation and something new to me.
15 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/7/2025 in #questions
Stanard Schema issues conformance
Arktype returns
ArkErrors which itself has issues getter function instead of an Array of Schema's Issue, and trying to serialize it results in an TypeError error:
15 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
Speaking of Start, I'm heading back to testing it more. Thanks for the help once more, and for a chat too! 😄
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
True. The Standard Schema is also supported by search params in router, and now I was checking how it behaves in the validators of the Start's server functions
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
I haven't used tanstack form lib, as I'm mostly using react hook form, so can't share the experience
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
Okay, I think I ended up with if else if, as I liked it more and didn't have many cases, but switch is also an option. But good to know that other options exist
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
By pure switch you mean the JS provided switch, and use discriminator as
switch(discriminator), right?47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
The match.in().at() looks interesting. I've written something similar in my current project for narrowing down the type of objects within the array (all objects were discriminated) of react-hook-form to make my life easier. The match looks much simpler
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
Yes, "Your First Type" was enough to get me started. I only skimmed through constraints, and completely skipped morphs as I didn't have a use for them yet
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
It's a bit like "sharpening the axe before cutting the tree". It's just good to know what the library offers. Probably impossible to remember everything, but basic familiarization of capabilities never hurts
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
That's what the docs are for 😄
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
Ah, that's alright. Sometimes you just can't post about everything and probably focus on most important stuff so that's nothing to worry about I would say
47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
It's in the docs, so we can say it's advertised 😄 I was mostly trying out tanstack start and trying if it supports other validators for server functions. I recently watched your appearance on devtools-fm and I picked arktype out of curiosity, so I'm pretty fresh to the library (no idea what
match is 😛 )47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
Completely missed the
/config, thanks!47 replies
Aarktype
•Created by Kuba on 3/5/2025 in #questions
Throw on failed validation
Sweet, now it threw
47 replies