icomad Posts - Answer Overflow

icomad

Explore posts from servers

KKysely TTCTheo's Typesafe Cult DTDrizzle Team

•Created by icomad on 9/9/2024 in #help

Correct typings for factory table

Hey all, I'm back again with a problem with typings on a factory function for creating tables. I already asked about this months ago but the solution that another user came up with, which was something similar to what I was doing, is not correct and presents some problems. The goal is to make a factory function that creates a table with some default columns, like timestamps, author columns etc... This is the "solution" we found at the time:

const baseTableSchema = {
  id: [...],
  createdAt: [...],
  updatedAt: [...],
  createdBy: [...],
  updatedBy: [...],
}
export const createTableFactory = <
  TTableName extends string,
  TColumnsMap extends Record<string, PgColumnBuilderBase>,
>(
  name: TTableName,
  fields: TColumnsMap,
  extraConfig?: (
    self: BuildExtraConfigColumns<
      TTableName,
      TColumnsMap & typeof baseTableSchema,
      "pg"
    >,
  ) => PgTableExtraConfig,
) => {
  const { id, ...baseColumns } = baseTableSchema;

  return pgTable<string, TColumnsMap & typeof baseTableSchema>(
    name,
    {
      id,
      ...fields,
      ...baseColumns,
    },
    extraConfig,
  );
};

const baseTableSchema = {
  id: [...],
  createdAt: [...],
  updatedAt: [...],
  createdBy: [...],
  updatedBy: [...],
}
export const createTableFactory = <
  TTableName extends string,
  TColumnsMap extends Record<string, PgColumnBuilderBase>,
>(
  name: TTableName,
  fields: TColumnsMap,
  extraConfig?: (
    self: BuildExtraConfigColumns<
      TTableName,
      TColumnsMap & typeof baseTableSchema,
      "pg"
    >,
  ) => PgTableExtraConfig,
) => {
  const { id, ...baseColumns } = baseTableSchema;

  return pgTable<string, TColumnsMap & typeof baseTableSchema>(
    name,
    {
      id,
      ...fields,
      ...baseColumns,
    },
    extraConfig,
  );
};

The problem I'm facing is that the with field when querying the db on the tables created using this factory is typed as {} | undefined, so something like this gives me lots of typescript errors

await db.query.testTable.findMany({
   with: {
      // no autocomplete with the related tables
      testTable2: {
        orderBy: (table, {desc}) => ... // both table and desc have type any
      }
   }
})

await db.query.testTable.findMany({
   with: {
      // no autocomplete with the related tables
      testTable2: {
        orderBy: (table, {desc}) => ... // both table and desc have type any
      }
   }
})

Does anyone know how to correct the typings?

2 replies

DTDrizzle Team

•Created by icomad on 6/7/2024 in #help

Table factory typescript problem

I have a basic table schema that all tables share (id, timestamps and more) and I'm trying to write an helper function that returns a pgTable with these fields already added. Right now it looks like this:

const baseTable: PgTableFn = (tableName, fields, extraConfig) => 
  pgTable(
    tableName, 
    {
      id: uuid("id").primaryKey(), 
      ...fields, 
      createdAt: timestamp("created_at"), 
      updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at")
    }, 
    extraConfig
  );

const testTable = baseTable(
  "test_table", 
  { test: text("test") }, 
  table => ({
    testIdx: index().on(table.test), // <- This is ok
    errIdx: index().on(table.createdAt) // <- This gives me an error
  })
);

const baseTable: PgTableFn = (tableName, fields, extraConfig) => 
  pgTable(
    tableName, 
    {
      id: uuid("id").primaryKey(), 
      ...fields, 
      createdAt: timestamp("created_at"), 
      updatedAt: timestamp("updated_at")
    }, 
    extraConfig
  );

const testTable = baseTable(
  "test_table", 
  { test: text("test") }, 
  table => ({
    testIdx: index().on(table.test), // <- This is ok
    errIdx: index().on(table.createdAt) // <- This gives me an error
  })
);

This is wrong though because testTable is not typed correctly and it is missing all the shared fields. How would I go about correcting this?

3 replies

TTCTheo's Typesafe Cult

•Created by icomad on 6/24/2023 in #questions

Uploadthing onUploadComplete file size is undefined

Hey all, the property file on the parameter of onUploadComplete callback should have a size property that is not undefined based on its type UploadedFile, but this is not the case. I've tried both on local and in production on vercel and I always get file.size as undefined. Is there something wrong in the implementation or is the type UploadedFile wrong and the file size is not actually added to the object?

3 replies

Gaming

Programming