devagr Comments - Answer Overflow

devagr

Posts Comments

SSolidJS

•Created by webstrand on 10/28/2024 in #support

<Show> not tracking signals

JSX is

28 replies

SSolidJS

•Created by webstrand on 10/28/2024 in #support

<Show> not tracking signals

the show callback is not reactive

28 replies

SSolidJS

•Created by webstrand on 10/28/2024 in #support

<Show> not tracking signals

it's the same issue here, the the signal isn't accessed in a reactive scope

28 replies

SSolidJS

•Created by anandreas on 10/23/2024 in #support

Modifying subsets of resources, not re-rendering

this should trigger the re-render as you expect

3 replies

SSolidJS

•Created by anandreas on 10/23/2024 in #support

Modifying subsets of resources, not re-rendering

you'll have to make it an immutable update so that the object reference changes.

peopleActions.mutate((people) => {
  people.map((p) => {
    if (p.url == personToRemove.url) {
      console.log(`deleting ${p.name}`);
      return { ...p, deleted: true };
    }
    return p;
  });
  return people;
});

peopleActions.mutate((people) => {
  people.map((p) => {
    if (p.url == personToRemove.url) {
      console.log(`deleting ${p.name}`);
      return { ...p, deleted: true };
    }
    return p;
  });
  return people;
});

3 replies

SSolidJS

•Created by swappea on 10/29/2024 in #support

Should I use reconcile everytime I use produce?

yes if your reducer returns an immutable value for the next state, reconcile is your best bet. it would be nice if your reducers can just mutate the current state into the next state instead of an immutable update, then you get to avoid the reconciliation. but if not, this is perfectly fine

5 replies

SSolidJS

•Created by webstrand on 10/28/2024 in #support

<Show> not tracking signals

it's like if you read a signal inside a component body and return its value instead of reading the value inside jsx

28 replies

SSolidJS

•Created by webstrand on 10/28/2024 in #support

<Show> not tracking signals

When you do <Show>{expression}</Show>, the expression is considered a reactive expression by the compiler. When you do <Show>{() => something}</Show>, this is not a reactive expression, just a callback to render the UI once. To track a signal, it has to run inside a reactive expression, which is why you need to wrap it in a fragment <>{counter().amount}</> so that the signal is read reactively

28 replies

TTCTheo's Typesafe Cult

•Created by theo (t3.gg) on 4/16/2023 in #questions

Mapped Types Not Inferring From Promise Correctly

same question

162 replies

TTCTheo's Typesafe Cult

•Created by theo (t3.gg) on 4/16/2023 in #questions

Mapped Types Not Inferring From Promise Correctly

so it's done? chatgpt got the right solution?

162 replies

TTCTheo's Typesafe Cult