are the shaper graphs fine ? V-Core 3.1 300m with RR Toolhead Beta 2
Hi everybody,
for the belt tension graph, i'm not sure how can I align the lines of the first spike, as like the second graph ? Could somebody help me there or would this be fine ?
For the frequency response and shapers for the x axies, i would have a question. Why is the ZV shaper recommended instead of the MZV as the ZV is showing a vibr=0.7%, while the ZV as a value of 0.0%
Thanks.
![No description](https://cdn.answeroverflow.com/1262140730344865933/belt-tension-resonances-2024-07-14-201627.png)
![No description](https://cdn.answeroverflow.com/1262140741270896751/resonances_x_2024-07-14-210148.png)
![No description](https://cdn.answeroverflow.com/1262140741610639410/resonances_y_2024-07-14-210214.png)
2 Replies
Yes, those are fine
Belt graph isn't perfect but they are close (two identifiable peaks in the correct locations, belts are somewhat close to each other in tension). May be worth looking into your toolhead and seeing if any wires are flopping around and could be ziptied down (since you seem to have a second peak around 100Hz, which is usually toolhead caused). It's nothing major given that your input shaper graphs are looking good.
Use MZV for both X and Y. It is probably recommending ZV in X because your vibration % is low in the grand scheme of things, even if MZV does offer a lower vibration percent. ZV sucks in actual use those, so stick with MZV and the recommended acceleration in MZV for your outside perimeters
alright, thanks @Ross13 for the quick answer 🙂 Will have another look at the toolhead related to the cable management and use MZV for both axies.
Will update the thread once i had a look at the cable management on the toolhead.