How do i get better server performance?
I recently had to migrate a project to digital ocean due to slow performance.
My question is not really project specific. I have put a few "trial projects" on railway and noticed they are not very performant vs when i deploy the identical dockerimage to minimum spec digital ocean for example.
Is there some way I can pay for a better or dedicated host?
The plan says "32 GB RAM / 32 vCPU per service".
I'm not taking a dig at railway here, i genuinly want a solution so i can start use the platform more.
11 Replies
Project ID:
N/A
N/A
Hey, I noticed this as well today. Just wanted to say Railway is not normally like this. I have had extremely bad performance with it the past several hours, so I think you just hit some unlucky timing. They might be getting DDoSed (happened in the past), overloaded, or similar
how many project do you have on railway?
Many
I've been using railway for many months, should be resolved shortly
I really think it's a one-off situation
but i dont even understand how that happens, cpu shouldn't be oversubscribed. and if someone gets ddos they can use up their CPU shares. and as long as there is enough on the host left for me then im good.
and the way it reads. per pro account gets allocated.
32 GB RAM / 32 vCPU per service
and my thing that was running slow was just a simple graphql api with a database.
what cpu do you get on your do droplet?
the smallest let me check
im talking about the actual cpu, not vcpu
instance_size_slug: apps-s-1vcpu-0.5gb
oh i see
it doesn't really say
/myrounds # cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 106
model name : unknown
stepping : unknown
cpu MHz : 2593.904
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 fma cx16 pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand hypervisor lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch fsgsbase bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid avx512f avx512dq rdseed adx smap clwb avx512cd avx512bw avx512vl xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 avx512vbmi umip pku ospke avx512_vbmi2 gfni vaes vpclmulqdq avx512_vnni avx512_bitalg avx512_vpopcntdq
bogomips : 2593.90
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 4
is there any way to get more dedicated or performant resources?
technically clock wise, you already do
but no, until they move to bare metal they dont have different hardware to run your service on
i also dont think this is a hardware bottleneck tbh