This looks interesting: https://
This looks interesting: https://threepipe.org/
7 Replies
very interesting- 1st time seeing this. i'm late to the icosa gallery party & need to catch up here, but have you looked at react-three-fiber or drei? likely overkill but believe they have modular viewer / editor examples https://github.com/pmndrs/react-three-fiber
GitHub
GitHub - pmndrs/react-three-fiber: 🇨🇠A React renderer for Three.js
🇨🇠A React renderer for Three.js. Contribute to pmndrs/react-three-fiber development by creating an account on GitHub.
GitHub
GitHub - pmndrs/drei: 🥉 useful helpers for react-three-fiber
🥉 useful helpers for react-three-fiber. Contribute to pmndrs/drei development by creating an account on GitHub.
The only problem there is I just don't get on with react.js - we're in the process of simplifying the front end down to mostly vanilla html and javascript. If I was going to go with a framework it would be something minimal along the lines of https://htmx.org/
</> htmx - high power tools for html
htmx gives you access to AJAX, CSS Transitions, WebSockets and Server Sent Events directly in HTML, using attributes, so you can build modern user interfaces with the simplicity and power of hypertext
htmx is small (~14k min.gz’d), dependency-free, extendable, IE11 compatible & has reduced code base sizes by 67% when compared with react
I also feel that the minute you pick a side on front-end frameworks you're excluding everyone who picked a different team.
(although "not picking a framework" is pretty much picking a team I guess)
makes sense. react is unnecessary roughness
It's a big learning curve for people that aren't full-time front-end devs
100%
simpler the better