Dseguy
ATApache TinkerPop
•Created by Dseguy on 12/28/2023 in #questions
Splitting a query with range()
I have spotted those issues, except the first one with order (it hasn't bitten me yet, but it is obviously waiting).
The current implementation with range(x, x + 1000) works well. It keeps the query limited in execution time. I can use configure the size of the batch (here 1000), until it starts using too much resources for too long.
I still need to test it with more constrained systems: I expected that 101000 queries would be faster than 110000 if there is a bottleneck somewhere. So far, one query is faster anyway, and the performances don't degrade fast enough (that is good).
9 replies
ATApache TinkerPop
•Created by Dseguy on 12/28/2023 in #questions
Splitting a query with range()
First, thanks so much for this detailled answer. This is appreciated.
9 replies
ATApache TinkerPop
•Created by Dseguy on 12/28/2023 in #questions
Splitting a query with range()
Tinkergraph and tinkergraph with Neo4j plugin.
9 replies
ATApache TinkerPop
•Created by Dseguy on 9/26/2023 in #questions
within() and case insensitive
Sounds good. Thanks to both of you.
6 replies