tin Comments - Answer Overflow

Ok, sorry for coming back again. I think this is really the last time. Will this incur boxing at runtime when I want to call that function? Because I will have to now explicitly cast everything as that interface to make it work right?

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

helped me a lot

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

ok, nevertheless thank you for answering my questions!

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

ah ok haha, if that is the only way I maybe will just write GetComponent(level) for the implementations

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

Maybe one more question in case you know that too. If I now have another method

  struct Attack : IUpgradableAttack<T>{
    public string Describe(){
      var comp = GetComponent();
    }
  }

  struct Attack : IUpgradableAttack<T>{
    public string Describe(){
      var comp = GetComponent();
    }
  }

throws an error, since GetComponent is not implemented and it somehow does not manage to use the default implementation from the interface. Prepending the interface name also does not work. Is there a way to use the default implementation without boxing?

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

thank you for helping!

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

I understood my mistake

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

Just tried it 🙂

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

Yup thanks!

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

Defining the interface as above works. However, when I implement a struct which implements that interface (and does not implement GetAttack), then C# start bugging me

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

Thanks for answering. Basically what I'd like to do is to have

interface IUpgradableAttack<T> : IAttack<T>{
  int level {get; set;}
  T GetAttack(int level);
  T GetAttack(){
    return GetAttack(level);
  }
}

interface IUpgradableAttack<T> : IAttack<T>{
  int level {get; set;}
  T GetAttack(int level);
  T GetAttack(){
    return GetAttack(level);
  }
}

so that I do not have to implement GetAttack when I have already implemented GetAttack(int level)

26 replies

CC#

•Created by tin on 3/4/2024 in #help

Using a default implementation on an interface

If I just put the default implementation inside of IUpgradableAttack, then when implementing that interface the compiler tells me I still need to implement GetAttack (even though there should be a default implementation)

26 replies

Gaming

Programming