Alexis
Alexis
TTypebot
Created by Alexis on 3/31/2025 in #help-and-questions
Question about the merge feature
Ah, I will need to edit all my bots then. I tried with and without. With merging, the result from bot A looks better at first. But I think it may cause an issue with a huge bot because it will create a lot of columns. If I understand the logging system, to simplify it a little, it creates one column each time we ask the visitor something/to interact. If I have a huge bot, I could have hundreds of column in the results. So I understand why it's considered an antipattern. However, on the billing part, there's one thing I wonder. If a visitor interact with bot A. Bot A call Bot B. Does it count as 2 conversations ? Because I will have a result log for both A & B so 2 lines = 2 conversations ? Edit: sorry I misunderstood the antipattern. I misread, I thought it was the merging the antipattern, not linking back to Bot A. I will need to edit my bot to see if I can do this differently.
4 replies
TTypebot
Created by Alexis on 3/26/2025 in #help-and-questions
Dynamically jump to previous step
Good idea, I haven't thought of that ! I didn't know the Jump to another typebot was not acting in a same way as a Jump. I'll probably need to double-check my bots because I wasn't expecting that.
4 replies
TTypebot
Created by Alexis on 3/13/2025 in #help-and-questions
Using multiple bot to improve builder performance. Copy/paste JUMP issue.
Yeah, Jump block won't fix the slowdown issue. But the "Jump to another typebox" fix it. But, since I can't copy/paste block with jump block to another bot (because it reset the destination, I have to update all jump after a copy/paste), I was wondering if : - Abandoning "normal" jump - replacing it with "Jump to another bot" but the another bot is "self" was a good idea. Because those, I can copy/paste from bot A to B without any issue. Because the "self reference" seems to be preserved in someway. But if it's considered a bug, then my solution is not needed anymore. I didn't know if this was "normal" or not.
7 replies