NΛRCISO
Explore posts from serversDTDrizzle Team
•Created by NΛRCISO on 9/14/2023 in #help
Optional One-to-One Relation
Currently it's possible to define only a One-to-One relation (https://orm.drizzle.team/docs/rqb#one-to-one) but in the types, the value returned will never be undefined or null.
In my use case I would like to define a One-to-One relation that could be optional.
Is there a solution? Is this even possible?
(I also raised an issue on GitHub (https://github.com/drizzle-team/drizzle-orm/issues/1066) a month ago but I think it got lost there)
1 replies