Klarth
Klarth
PostsComments
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Most of them are 1:1 with System.Reactive though there are some new operators, too.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Well, once each input stream has pushed at least one item.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
And you'll see it emits a new item (containing the latest value of each input) each time one of the input streams pushes a new item.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Like if you don't understand what CombineLatest does, you can always look at https://github.com/Cysharp/R3/blob/main/tests/R3.Tests/OperatorTests/CombineLatestTest.cs
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
The unit tests seem really clean and concise. Which helps understanding how certain features work.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Yeah, observables are awkward. I need to invest time into R3 basics at some point. Largely same thing, but different implementation. https://github.com/Cysharp/R3
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
I assume the pattern can be smarter with pooling (and the limitations that would come from that) and make MVU reasonable with said enforced pattern. But that's a lot of invested time. Time that I prefer the pattern architect to put in, not me.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Not entirely related, but Avalonia allows you to bind directly to observables. Though it's still a one-way road.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Uno has its own adaptation called MVUX: https://platform.uno/docs/articles/external/uno.extensions/doc/Overview/Mvux/Overview.html?tabs=viewmodel%2Cmodel
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
No idea. I saw the pattern and I'm not willing to put real time behind unproven stuff in .NET, especially if it has obvious flaws (object churn).
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
In case you need inspiration. I still personally just don't like it. 🤷‍♂️
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Avalonia has https://github.com/AvaloniaUI/Avalonia.Markup.Declarative Uno has https://platform.uno/c-markup/
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Well, the Avalonia PropertyStore (system which manages bindings, setter priorities, etc) is built around observables. So you can do a lot with reactive programming.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Of course, other XAML frameworks aren't implemented as native, so you only get part of those benefits.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Well fine then Modix, embed the whole thing. :harold:
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
See https://discord.com/channels/143867839282020352/169726357331378176/1298419243033034894
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
So if you're using UWP (or presumably WinUI3), then there are a lot of perf improvements you're losing by moving your UI into C#.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Keep in mind that XAML has some serious space for optimizations that C# can't do.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
I don't see how XAML bindings are difficult.
39 replies
CC#
Created by MechWarrior99 on 1/18/2025 in #help
Would a Declarative Reactive UI be too expensive?
Comet, which was going to be MVU for Maui, broke MVU immutability rules and then the author moved from MS to Meta to some AI frontend place.
39 replies