vrtnis
MModular
•Created by Martin Dudek on 5/16/2024 in #questions
Python integration and performance
ohh got it..makes sense!
10 replies
MModular
•Created by Martin Dudek on 5/16/2024 in #questions
Python integration and performance
also, just building on the comment above, for now it seems like we'd have to handle such issues on a case-by-case basis rather than a general approach. here it could be something like:
utils.py
def get_dict_and_modify(num):
di = {}
for i in range(num):
di[str(i*2)] = i%3
for key in dic.keys():
di[key] *= 2
return di
and then
from python import Python
from time import now
alias NUM = 1_000_000
fn main() raises:
start = now()
Python.add_to_path("./utils")
var utils: PythonObject = Python.import_module("utils")
var dict = utils.get_dict_and_modify(NUM)
var elapsed = (now()-start)/1_000_000_000
print("time:", elapsed, "sec")
_ = dict["112"]10 replies
MModular
•Created by Martin Dudek on 5/16/2024 in #questions
Python integration and performance
wondering if, in this example, we can minimize the number of calls between mojo and python. perhaps batch operations together in python as much as possible before passing the result to mojo
10 replies
Mmarimo
•Created by vrtnis on 3/31/2024 in #archived-help-and-support
Cohere in WASM
great idea!- didn't know abt that - just created a new package request
2 replies