N
Nuxt5d ago
Hum+

Can I use giget in the modules field?

Trying to understand where giget is implemented in Nuxt. Layers work but trying it in modules does not.
17 Replies
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
Hi @Hum+. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave: ---------------------- Based on the knowledge sources, I can clarify how giget is implemented in Nuxt and why it works with layers but not directly in the modules field. Giget is primarily implemented for the extends property in Nuxt configuration, not for the modules field. The knowledge sources show that Nuxt uses unjs/giget specifically for extending remote layers and for the nuxi init command. When using the extends property in your nuxt.config.ts, you can reference remote git repositories:
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
'github:username/repoName', // GitHub Remote Source
'github:username/repoName/base', // GitHub Remote Source within /base directory
'github:username/repoName#dev', // GitHub Remote Source from dev branch
'github:username/repoName#v1.0.0', // GitHub Remote Source from v1.0.0 tag
'gitlab:username/repoName', // GitLab Remote Source example
'bitbucket:username/repoName', // Bitbucket Remote Source example
]
})
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
'github:username/repoName', // GitHub Remote Source
'github:username/repoName/base', // GitHub Remote Source within /base directory
'github:username/repoName#dev', // GitHub Remote Source from dev branch
'github:username/repoName#v1.0.0', // GitHub Remote Source from v1.0.0 tag
'gitlab:username/repoName', // GitLab Remote Source example
'bitbucket:username/repoName', // Bitbucket Remote Source example
]
})
For the modules field, however, the documentation specifies a different format:
modules: [
// Using package name (recommended usage)
'@nuxtjs/example',

// Load a local module
'./modules/example',

// Add module with inline-options
['./modules/example', { token: '123' }],

// Inline module definition
async (inlineOptions, nuxt) => { }
]
modules: [
// Using package name (recommended usage)
'@nuxtjs/example',

// Load a local module
'./modules/example',

// Add module with inline-options
['./modules/example', { token: '123' }],

// Inline module definition
async (inlineOptions, nuxt) => { }
]
As stated in the Nuxt Configuration documentation, modules are either: - A string (package name or path to a file) - A tuple with the module as first string and options as a second object - An inline module function The documentation doesn't mention support for giget-style URLs in the modules field. Nuxt tries to resolve each item in the modules array using Node's require path (in node_modules) or from the project's srcDir if the ~ alias is used. This explains why giget syntax works with layers (via the extends property) but not directly in the modules field. If you need to use a remote module, you would typically need to install it as a package first, rather than referencing it directly with a giget URL in the modules array. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
<@544244461228654592> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
Hum+
Hum+OP5d ago
@kapa.ai That clears up a lot. however I want to tokenize module access from gitlab. How would you do this
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books: ---------------------- Based on the knowledge sources, I can explain how to tokenize module access from GitLab when working with Nuxt. For accessing private GitLab repositories as layers in Nuxt, you need to provide authentication tokens. This can be done in two ways: 1. Using environment variables:
GIGET_AUTH=<token>
GIGET_AUTH=<token>
2. Directly configuring it in your nuxt.config.ts with the auth option: For self-hosted GitLab instances, you can also specify the GitLab URL:
GIGET_GITLAB_URL=<url>
GIGET_GITLAB_URL=<url>
This approach works for the extends property in your Nuxt configuration, as mentioned in the Publishing Layers documentation:
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
'gitlab:username/repoName', // GitLab Remote Source example
]
})
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
'gitlab:username/repoName', // GitLab Remote Source example
]
})
However, as we discussed previously, this giget-style URL syntax is not directly supported in the modules field. For modules, you would typically need to: 1. First install the module from GitLab as a package 2. Then reference it in your modules array by its package name If you need to use a private module from GitLab, you would configure your npm/yarn/pnpm to authenticate with GitLab's package registry, then install and use the module like any other npm package. For modules that you want to access directly from GitLab without publishing them as packages, you might need to consider creating a layer instead, where the giget authentication mechanism is supported. The knowledge sources don't provide specific information about tokenizing module access directly in the modules field using giget-style URLs, as this functionality appears to be limited to the extends property for layers. Is there a specific use case you're trying to implement with GitLab modules that I might be able to help with further? ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
<@544244461228654592> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
Hum+
Hum+OP5d ago
@kapa.ai I'm well aware of the layers route, currently I want to move away from injecting an entire Nuxt app back to just a module with gated control.
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books: ---------------------- I understand you want to move from using a full Nuxt layer to a more focused module approach with gated access control. Based on the knowledge sources, there are a few approaches you could consider: Using Local Modules with Access Control You could create a local module in your project's modules/ directory, which would be automatically registered:
// modules/my-module/index.ts
import { defineNuxtModule } from 'nuxt/kit'

export default defineNuxtModule({
meta: {
name: 'my-module'
},
setup(options, nuxt) {
// Implement your access control logic here
// You can check for authentication tokens or other credentials
}
})
// modules/my-module/index.ts
import { defineNuxtModule } from 'nuxt/kit'

export default defineNuxtModule({
meta: {
name: 'my-module'
},
setup(options, nuxt) {
// Implement your access control logic here
// You can check for authentication tokens or other credentials
}
})
As mentioned in the modules directory documentation, these local modules are automatically registered without needing to add them to your nuxt.config.ts. Publishing as an NPM Package with Access Control For a more distributed approach, you could publish your module as an npm package (either publicly or privately):
// In your module's nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
// Your module configuration
})
// In your module's nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
// Your module configuration
})
Then in your package.json:
{
"name": "my-module",
"version": "1.0.0",
"type": "module",
"main": "./nuxt.config.ts",
"dependencies": {},
"devDependencies": {
"nuxt": "^3.0.0"
}
}
{
"name": "my-module",
"version": "1.0.0",
"type": "module",
"main": "./nuxt.config.ts",
"dependencies": {},
"devDependencies": {
"nuxt": "^3.0.0"
}
}
As noted in the Publishing Layers documentation, when publishing as a private npm package, users would need to authenticate with npm to download it, providing a form of access control. Runtime Authentication in Your Module You could also implement runtime authentication checks within your module:
// Inside your module's setup function
setup(options, nuxt) {
// Check for authentication tokens in options
if (!options.authToken || !validateToken(options.authToken)) {
throw new Error('Invalid or missing authentication token')
}

// Continue with module setup if authenticated
}
// Inside your module's setup function
setup(options, nuxt) {
// Check for authentication tokens in options
if (!options.authToken || !validateToken(options.authToken)) {
throw new Error('Invalid or missing authentication token')
}

// Continue with module setup if authenticated
}
Users would then need to provide valid credentials when adding your module:
// In the user's nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
modules: [
['my-module', { authToken: 'user-specific-token' }]
]
})
// In the user's nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
modules: [
['my-module', { authToken: 'user-specific-token' }]
]
})
The knowledge sources don't specifically address using GitLab tokens directly with modules (as opposed to layers), but these approaches should give you a foundation for implementing gated access to your module functionality. Would any of these approaches work for your specific use case? ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
<@544244461228654592> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
Hum+
Hum+OP5d ago
@kapa.ai Yes but, this means the module has to be npm'd. I want it to be giget'ted by including it via modules like layers.
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books: ---------------------- Based on the knowledge sources, I understand you want to use giget to directly fetch a module from a Git repository in the modules field, similar to how layers work with the extends property. Unfortunately, the knowledge sources indicate that this functionality is not directly supported for the modules field in Nuxt. According to the Nuxt Configuration documentation, modules can only be specified as: - A string (package name or path to a file) - A tuple with the module as first string and options as a second object - An inline module function The giget integration is specifically implemented for the extends property for layers, as mentioned in the Going Deeper section:
Configuration loading and extends support is handled by unjs/c12, merged using unjs/defu and remote git sources are supported using unjs/giget.
There's no equivalent mechanism documented for the modules field to directly fetch from Git repositories using giget syntax. You might consider these alternatives: 1. Use a layer instead of a module if that fits your architecture 2. Create a custom setup script that uses giget to fetch your module code before Nuxt starts 3. Implement a local module that uses giget internally to fetch and load your remote module code The knowledge sources don't provide information about any undocumented or experimental features that would allow direct giget integration with the modules field. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
<@544244461228654592> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
Hum+
Hum+OP5d ago
@kapa.ai 1. How much extra RAM does a extra layer require during build time with prerendering? 2/3. Can you give me a basic example for just this feature (like giget layers)
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books: ---------------------- I'll address your questions about Nuxt layers and prerendering: 1. RAM usage for extra layers during prerendering The knowledge sources don't provide specific information about the exact RAM requirements for additional layers during build time with prerendering. However, there is a relevant issue mentioned that indicates memory consumption can be a concern: In GitHub issue #14168, there was a report about running out of memory during nuxt generate (which performs prerendering). The issue mentioned that removing @nuxt/scripts resolved the problem on a 16GB system where memory usage reached around 5GB. This suggests that certain layers or modules can significantly impact memory usage during prerendering, but the exact amount would depend on: - The complexity and size of the layer - The number of pages being prerendered - Other modules and dependencies in your project 2. Basic example for giget layers Here's a basic example of using giget to extend from a remote layer:
// nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
'github:username/repoName', // GitHub Remote Source
'github:username/repoName/base', // GitHub Remote Source within /base directory
'github:username/repoName#dev', // GitHub Remote Source from dev branch
]
})
// nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
'github:username/repoName', // GitHub Remote Source
'github:username/repoName/base', // GitHub Remote Source within /base directory
'github:username/repoName#dev', // GitHub Remote Source from dev branch
]
})
For private repositories, you can add authentication:
// nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
// With authentication token for private repositories
['github:username/repoName', { auth: process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN }]
]
})
// nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
// With authentication token for private repositories
['github:username/repoName', { auth: process.env.GITHUB_TOKEN }]
]
})
If you want to install dependencies from the remote layer:
// nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
['github:username/repoName', { install: true }]
]
})
// nuxt.config.ts
export default defineNuxtConfig({
extends: [
['github:username/repoName', { install: true }]
]
})
As noted in the Publishing Layers documentation, when using git remote sources with install: true, the layer's npm dependencies will be installed in a special location (node_modules/.c12/layer_name/node_modules/). Remember that a minimal Nuxt layer directory should contain at least a nuxt.config.ts file to indicate it is a layer, as mentioned in the Authoring Nuxt Layers documentation. Would you like more specific information about any aspect of using layers with giget? ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
<@544244461228654592> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
Hum+
Hum+OP5d ago
@kapa.ai Question 2 was about an example for modules giget functionality.
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books: ---------------------- I apologize for misinterpreting your previous question. To clarify, based on the knowledge sources provided, there is no direct support for using giget syntax in the modules field of Nuxt configuration. As I mentioned earlier, giget functionality is specifically implemented for the extends property for layers, not for the modules field. The Nuxt Configuration documentation shows that modules can only be specified as: - A string (package name or path to a file) - A tuple with the module as first string and options as a second object - An inline module function There is no equivalent mechanism documented that would allow you to directly fetch modules from Git repositories using giget syntax in the modules array. If you want to use a module directly from a Git repository without publishing it to npm first, you would need to consider alternative approaches such as: 1. Using layers instead (where giget is supported) 2. Creating a custom setup script that fetches the module code before Nuxt starts 3. Implementing a local module that internally uses giget to fetch remote code The knowledge sources don't provide examples of using giget with modules because this functionality doesn't appear to be supported in the current Nuxt implementation. ---------------------- Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon: ----------------------
kapa.ai
kapa.ai5d ago
<@544244461228654592> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.

Did you find this page helpful?