Mocking a plugin
Is it possible to mock a plugin which is imported using useNuxtApp() in a component which is being unit tested?
6 Replies
Hi @Tobberoth. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
----------------------
Yes, it's possible to mock a plugin that's imported using
useNuxtApp()
in a component being unit tested. In Nuxt 3, you can use the mockNuxtImport
utility from @nuxt/test-utils/runtime
to mock the Nuxt imports, including plugins accessed via useNuxtApp()
.
Here's how you can approach this:
1. First, use mockNuxtImport
to mock the useNuxtApp
function:
If you need different implementations between tests, you can use vi.hoisted
to create and expose your mocks:
Remember that mockNuxtImport
can only be used once per mocked import per test file, as it's a macro that gets transformed to vi.mock
, which is hoisted in Vitest as mentioned in the documentation.
When testing components that use these plugins, you can use mountSuspended
from @nuxt/test-utils/runtime
to mount your component within the Nuxt environment:
Make sure your test file is properly set up to use the Nuxt environment, either by naming it with .nuxt.spec.ts
extension or by adding the // @vitest-environment nuxt
comment at the top of your test file.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@184996700883124225> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
@kapa.ai Mocking useNuxtApp() does not seem to be a viable option, I get an error that nuxtApp.deferHydration() is not a function.
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
I understand the issue you're facing with mocking
useNuxtApp()
. The error about nuxtApp.deferHydration()
not being a function suggests that your mock is missing some essential functionality that Nuxt expects.
Instead of completely mocking useNuxtApp()
, a better approach would be to use runWithContext
to ensure the proper Nuxt context is maintained. Here are a few alternative approaches:
Option 1: Use mockNuxtImport
for specific plugins or composables
Rather than mocking the entire useNuxtApp()
, you can mock just the specific plugin or functionality you need:
Option 2: Use vi.hoisted
with a more complete mock
If you still need to mock useNuxtApp()
, ensure you include all the necessary functions:
Option 3: Use tryUseNuxtApp
for safer access
In your component, you might want to use tryUseNuxtApp
instead of useNuxtApp
if the plugin access is optional:
Then in your test, you can mock just the specific functionality:
The deferHydration
function is part of Nuxt's internal hydration process, and mocking it incorrectly can cause issues. Using one of the approaches above should help you avoid this problem while still allowing you to test your component effectively.
If you're still encountering issues, you might want to consider using the Nuxt testing environment which provides a more complete Nuxt context for your tests.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@184996700883124225> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
Ok so it's not possible. nice waste of time there ^^