Improval of Scrol-Saver
Hello, I got this code:
Any ideas how I can get it that it doesnt flicker when using this?
I use a div and added there
<div saveScroll>
... I made this because somehow Nuxt sets the scrollTop everytime to 0...21 Replies
Hi @MrFox. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
----------------------
I understand you're experiencing flickering when using your scroll position saving code for a sidebar in Nuxt. This is a common issue when manipulating scroll positions during page navigation.
The Issue
The flickering occurs because there's a brief moment when the scroll position resets to 0 before your code restores the saved position. This happens because Nuxt's default router behavior resets scroll positions during navigation.
Potential Solutions
1. Use setTimeout for Delayed Restoration
One approach is to delay the scroll restoration slightly to ensure it happens after Nuxt's default scroll behavior:
This small timeout can help avoid the flickering by ensuring your code runs after Nuxt's internal scroll handling.
2. Consider Using useCookie Instead of sessionStorage
Several Nuxt users have found that using
useCookie
instead of sessionStorage
provides better state persistence:
This approach is recommended in Nuxt 3 for state persistence between reloads as mentioned in this Stack Overflow solution.
3. Handle sessionStorage Errors
Your code might also benefit from error handling when accessing sessionStorage, as it can throw errors in certain situations:
This is a good practice as Nuxt has had issues with sessionStorage access in the past as noted in this PR.
4. Use runWithContext for Composables
If you're using any Nuxt composables within your functions, make sure to use runWithContext
to ensure proper context:
This helps with context restoration as documented in Nuxt.
I hope these suggestions help reduce the flickering in your scroll position saving implementation!
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@702574561857896569> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
@kapa.ai If I understood right I can use then
But this errors:
router.ts:56 [Vue warn]: onMounted is called when there is no active component instance to be associated with. Lifecycle injection APIs can only be used during execution of setup(). If you are using async setup(), make sure to register lifecycle hooks before the first await statement.
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
I see the issue you're encountering with the
onMounted
hook inside runWithContext
. This is happening because onMounted
is a Vue lifecycle hook that needs to be called during component setup, but you're trying to use it in a plugin context.
The error message is clear: "Lifecycle injection APIs can only be used during execution of setup()."
Here's how you can fix this:
Solution
Instead of using onMounted
in your plugin, you should use Nuxt app hooks which are designed for this purpose:
The page:finish
hook is called when the page is fully loaded and mounted, which is similar to what you were trying to achieve with onMounted
. This is the appropriate hook to use in this context as mentioned in this Stack Overflow post.
If you're still experiencing flickering, you might also want to try:
Remember that runWithContext
is primarily used to restore the Nuxt context in complex async scenarios, particularly in middleware and plugins where the context might be lost after async operations. In your case, using the appropriate Nuxt hook should be sufficient without needing runWithContext
.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@702574561857896569> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
@kapa.ai Whats the difference between vpage:loading:end
and
page:finish`?Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Based on the knowledge sources, I can explain the difference between
page:loading:end
and page:finish
hooks in Nuxt:
Difference between page:loading:end
and page:finish
page:finish
- Called when the Suspense resolved event occurs
- Triggered when the page component has finished loading and rendering
- Occurs when the setup of the new page component is complete
- Documentation reference
page:loading:end
- Called after page:finish
- Specifically designed to signal that the loading state should end
- Used by the loading indicator system to know when to hide the loading UI
- Documentation reference
The sequence of events during navigation is typically:
1. page:loading:start
- When the setup()
of the new page starts running
2. page:start
- When Suspense enters pending state
3. page:finish
- When Suspense resolves (page component is ready)
4. page:loading:end
- After page:finish, signaling loading is complete
There have been some issues with these hooks in the past:
- The page:loading:end
hook was sometimes called twice during navigation (GitHub issue #26535)
- In some cases with nested pages, the loading indicator could get stuck because page:loading:end
wasn't triggered properly (GitHub PR #31201)
For your scroll-saving functionality, either hook could work, but page:finish
might be more reliable as it's directly tied to when the page component is fully loaded, while page:loading:end
is more specifically for controlling loading indicators.
If you're experiencing flickering, you might want to try page:transition:finish
instead, which fires after the page transition's onAfterLeave
event, ensuring all animations are complete.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@702574561857896569> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
@kapa.ai which methods are therer to create a store using pinia?
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Creating Stores with Pinia in Nuxt
Based on the knowledge sources, there are two main methods to create a store using Pinia in Nuxt:
1. Setup Store (Composition API)
This is the modern, recommended approach using the Composition API with the
defineStore
function:
This approach is shown in the Nuxt state management documentation.
2. Options Store (Similar to Vuex style)
This approach uses an options object similar to Vuex:
This style is demonstrated in the Nuxt migration documentation.
Using Stores in Components
After creating a store, you can use it in your components:
Composing Stores
You can also compose stores by creating a composable and using it in multiple stores:
This pattern is shown in a Stack Overflow answer.
To use Pinia in Nuxt, make sure to install the @pinia/nuxt
module and add it to your nuxt.config.ts
modules array.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@702574561857896569> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
@kapa.ai Is this here:
Also possible without returning the values?
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Based on the knowledge sources, I need to clarify an important point about Pinia stores in Nuxt.
No, it's not possible to create a Pinia store without returning the values. The return statement is essential in the setup-style Pinia store because:
1. The return statement defines what will be exposed from your store and available to components that use it.
2. Without returning values, components would have no way to access the state, getters, or actions defined in your store.
This is similar to how Vue's Composition API works in general - you need to return what you want to make available outside the setup function.
Here's what would happen if you didn't return the values:
In this case, components using
useUserStore()
would get an empty object or undefined, making the store essentially useless.
The return statement is what makes the reactive state and functions accessible to the rest of your application, which is the whole purpose of using a store in the first place.
If you're looking for a way to share state without explicitly returning values, you might want to look at Nuxt's useState
composable instead, but even there you'd need to return the state from your composable if you wrap it.
Would you like to know more about alternative state management approaches in Nuxt?
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@702574561857896569> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
@kapa.ai Can I add parameters to the init of useUserStore?
Like useUserStore(token:string)
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Based on the knowledge sources, I can explain how to pass parameters to Pinia stores in Nuxt.
When using Pinia in Nuxt, you can't directly pass parameters to the store initialization function like
useUserStore(token: string)
. However, there are a couple of approaches you can use to achieve similar functionality:
1. Using the Pinia instance parameter
The defineStore
setup function actually receives the Pinia instance as a parameter, which you can use when initializing your store:
2. Creating actions to initialize the store
A more common approach is to create an initialization action in your store:
Then in your component:
3. Using a plugin for global initialization
For values that should be available throughout your app, you can use a Nuxt plugin:
This approach is shown in the Nuxt migration documentation.
Would you like me to explain any of these approaches in more detail?
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@702574561857896569> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
@kapa.ai without an extra function directly by useUserStore(config.token)
Let me check the knowledge base for you again. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Based on the knowledge sources, I don't see a direct way to pass parameters to a Pinia store like
useUserStore(config.token)
in Nuxt without using an initialization function.
The standard Pinia store pattern in Nuxt doesn't support passing custom parameters directly to the store when calling it. The only parameter that can be passed to useUserStore()
is the Pinia instance itself, which is typically handled automatically by the @pinia/nuxt
module.
From the knowledge sources, I can see that when using Pinia outside of components (like in middleware or plugins), you might need to use useNuxtApp().runWithContext()
to ensure the Pinia context is available:
This is mentioned in this GitHub issue as a solution for the "no active Pinia" error.
However, this still doesn't allow passing custom parameters to the store initialization.
The most idiomatic approach in Pinia/Nuxt remains creating an initialization action in your store that you call after creating the store instance, as I mentioned in my previous response.
Would you like me to suggest alternative patterns for managing configuration values that might better suit your use case?
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------<@702574561857896569> Kapa.ai is still learning and improving, please let me know how I did by reacting below.
k