Disabling Bungee /server Command
I am wanting to disable the /server command for everyone except Admin and staff...and make everyone else use a portal from the server hub, to whatever world they would like to play in.
I have tried disabling it in the Bungee config as well, by setting it to staff/admin only...but that did not work and made it so no one, not even Sys Op could use the command. I tried adding bungeecord.command.server in LuckPerms in the worlds, and then setting it to false...still did nothing, and everyone could still use the /server command.
How do I accomplish blocking the /server command for everyone but Admin/Staff...and only allowing that tranport by portal? Any help is appreciated. Thank you!
21 Replies
Thanks for asking your question!
Make sure to provide as much helpful information as possible such as logs/what you tried and what your exact issue is
Make sure to mark solved when issue is solved!!!
/close
!close
!solved
!answered
Requested by benmonkeymommy#0
By the way, I have tried Googling it...and that's where I got the idea to try adding the bungeecord.command.server to LunckPerms and setting it to false.
is there a reason you arent using velocity?
thats better in every way except a slightly fewer plugins
Because not all of the plugins I am using are available. And I have way more experience with bungee/spigot than the velocity.
luckperms only works if you have luckperms on the proxy
and the use lpb
unless you link luckperms between servers with a database
But if I put LuckPerms on the proxy, won't that make the rules the same for all servers? Or only the rules that I set in the proxy...and then can add additional rules in each world?
you can use Luckperms Contexts.
In the luckperms config file (at the top / near the top) you can specify the server "id" that luckperms is installed on
then you can use the server context and do
server=survival and that permission will only apply on the server with the survival setting in its config.ymlLuckPerms - A permissions plugin for Minecraft servers.
LuckPerms
LuckPerms is a permissions plugin for Minecraft servers. It allows server admins to control what features players can use by creating groups and assigning permissions.
you would typically link all the backend servers and the frontend to a mysql database for luckperms
All my servers are different, thus why I need different permissions on each. I have one non PvP survival world, one PvP survival world, 2 survival worlds I am working on phasing out...and will be adding a creative world, a Skyblock world, and eventually a games world (with bedwars, hide & seek, etc).
well
you can try put luckperms on the proxy if you wish but
without using mysql*
but well uh
All instances of LuckPerms must be connected to the same storage system. This means you are limited to using MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL or MongoDB. LuckPerms must be connected to the same SQL / MongoDB server, and access the same database or collection.Would it conflict if I put LuckPerms on the proxy, and set the base permissions on it that are shared by all worlds...and then add LuckPerms to each individual world and only add the pemissions unique to that world?
read this.
you can the LP Network installation guide which requires linking all backend servers and the proxy with mysql
You can then absolutely set the common permissions, and also set the unique world / server permissions by using luckperms
server contextLuckPerms - A permissions plugin for Minecraft servers.
LuckPerms
LuckPerms is a permissions plugin for Minecraft servers. It allows server admins to control what features players can use by creating groups and assigning permissions.
you can also just keep em seperated without a db
that works too
ig
So if I use no database, the LuckPerms on the proxy would only govern the proxy...and then LuckPerms on each server would govern itself?
yup
yep
I guess I will try this way, then.
go for it
I've made the server for me, my kid, his friends, and some of my friends...and he always wants all the different world options. Lol.
!solved
Closed post!
Your post has been marked as solved!
Requested by benmonkeymommy#0