21 Replies
@Dexter
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.Your reference is the central bond. It's not a bridge in this case, but that's fine. You have four carbons on either side of the central bond. You don't count the bridgeheads.
So it's [4.4.0]
def not in syllabus
It isn't??
My life is a lie
oh what
IUPAC nomenclature of organic
molecules (hydrocarbons, including simple cyclic hydrocarbons and their
mono-functional and bi-functional derivatives only);
see syllabus man
this is advanced that too
soooo ye advanced me bhi nahi hai??? wont this come under bi functional derivatives
you dont consider bridge carbons
yea i got that but if this isnt in the syllabus i wont stress over it na
nahi hua to bhi theek ho gaya to Jai Shree Ram
NTA when they have to release a proper syllabus :aah:
lol
my sir taught me today lol
and preparing for adv also so why not just learn
ok so basically bridge bond wale atoms
will not be considered
in numbering
and each bacha hua part of ring
will be numbered separately
yes
thats the way everyday go
Bifunctional derivatives are stuff like salicylaldehyde and all that. Two functional groups on a ring or a chain. Not Bicyclo rings.
ok ji
thanku yall
+solved @Opt @RDES @iTeachChem
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@964432960197632059> (964432960197632059)
Time
<t:1733309007:R>
Solved by
<@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892), <@952075301175820288> (952075301175820288), <@1035556259417571408> (1035556259417571408)