C#•2mo ago

Calling static method of interface via it's type

There's an interface called ISerializer. ISerializer implements two static methods called Serialize and Deserialize. There's a class that implements ISerializer called ArraySerializer. ArraySerializer is requires an generic type parameter of type ISerializer... The ArraySerializer needs to call the Serialize/Deserialize method of the generic type parameter

34 Replies

NaniorOP•2mo ago

What bugs me is that I know that the Type implements ISerializable, why can't I use the static methods of it?

c#
public class ArraySerializer<T, TSerializer> : ISerializer<T[]> where TSerializer : ISerializer<T>
{
    public static void Deserialize(Stream stream, out T[] value)
    {
        value = new T[BitConverter.ToInt32(stream.Read(sizeof(int)))];
        for (int i = 0; i < value.Length; i++)
        {
            value[i] = TSerializer.Deserialize()
        }
    }

    public static void Serialize(Stream stream, T[] value)
    {
        stream.Write(BitConverter.GetBytes(value.Length));
    }
}

c#
public class ArraySerializer<T, TSerializer> : ISerializer<T[]> where TSerializer : ISerializer<T>
{
    public static void Deserialize(Stream stream, out T[] value)
    {
        value = new T[BitConverter.ToInt32(stream.Read(sizeof(int)))];
        for (int i = 0; i < value.Length; i++)
        {
            value[i] = TSerializer.Deserialize()
        }
    }

    public static void Serialize(Stream stream, T[] value)
    {
        stream.Write(BitConverter.GetBytes(value.Length));
    }
}

sibber•2mo ago

what type implements ISerializable?

blueberriesiftheywerecats•2mo ago

Where T : ISerializer<T> Or if your type itself can't be a serializer, then just create an instance of TSerializer

sibber•2mo ago

this is all static here ~~which yeah isnt a very good idea but whatever~~ what do you expect TSerializer.Deserialize() to do?

NaniorOP•2mo ago

Deserialize is a method that reads from a stream and returns something of Type T, that's what ISerializer is meant for (ISerializer is custom, not to be mistaken with whatever other interface that might be named the same) Unfortunately turns out it doesn't quite work the way I intended, particularly the part about static methods not being reference-able via the type Might have to completely rethink how this is supposed to work...

sibber•2mo ago

yeah but youre not giving it any arguments

NaniorOP•2mo ago

I'm not giving it any arguments because look like it does not exist... Basically apparently you can't normally call a static method by the type That's why I'm asking, because I might need to step back and comepletely rethink the whole system, cus looks like my original plan is invalid in multiple ways How would you write something like this? It's meant to be used for saving primarily, converting binary from and to other types

sibber•2mo ago

im not sure what youre asking

MODiX•2mo ago

sibber

REPL Result: Success

Print<Test>();

void Print<T>() where T : ITest
{
    Console.WriteLine(T.Get());
}

interface ITest
{
    static abstract int Get();
}

class Test : ITest
{
    public static int Get() => 5;
}

Print<Test>();

void Print<T>() where T : ITest
{
    Console.WriteLine(T.Get());
}

interface ITest
{
    static abstract int Get();
}

class Test : ITest
{
    public static int Get() => 5;
}

Console Output

Compile: 420.469ms | Execution: 74.448ms | React with ❌ to remove this embed.

sibber•2mo ago

thats valid

MODiX•2mo ago

sibber

REPL Result: Success

return ArraySerializer<int, IntSerializer>.Deserialize();

interface ISerializer<T>
{
    static abstract T Deserialize();
}

class IntSerializer : ISerializer<int>
{
    public static int Deserialize() => 5;
}

class ArraySerializer<T, TSerializer> : ISerializer<T[]>
    where TSerializer : ISerializer<T>
{
    public static T[] Deserialize()
    {
        var arr = new T[3];
        for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++)
        {
            arr[i] = TSerializer.Deserialize();
        }

        return arr;
    }
}

return ArraySerializer<int, IntSerializer>.Deserialize();

interface ISerializer<T>
{
    static abstract T Deserialize();
}

class IntSerializer : ISerializer<int>
{
    public static int Deserialize() => 5;
}

class ArraySerializer<T, TSerializer> : ISerializer<T[]>
    where TSerializer : ISerializer<T>
{
    public static T[] Deserialize()
    {
        var arr = new T[3];
        for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++)
        {
            arr[i] = TSerializer.Deserialize();
        }

        return arr;
    }
}

Result: int[]

[
  5,
  5,
  5
]

[
  5,
  5,
  5
]

Compile: 428.780ms | Execution: 43.170ms | React with ❌ to remove this embed.

sibber•2mo ago

i think youre trying to do something like this? what isnt working for you?

NaniorOP•2mo ago

Huh... Idk why it's working for you... Sure didn't when I did it? Is it Unity's C# version or something?

sibber•2mo ago

oh unity yeah it uses an old version, thats not supported

NaniorOP•2mo ago

Back in mine, static interface methods must have a body, yours doesn't

sibber•2mo ago

did unity upgrdae to a newer version or something? static interface methods are fairly new iirc anyway you need to declare them abstract in the interface btw there are many serialization libraries so theres no need to do this for something other than learning

NaniorOP•2mo ago

MessagePack always breaks badly, somehow I originally struggled with MessagePack a lot to get it to work in the first place

sibber•2mo ago

breaks how trying to fix it would be easier than writing your own

NaniorOP•2mo ago

Later I struggled with it for days again when trying IL2CPP for potentially faster runtime And now it's when I tried migrating to Unity6

sibber•2mo ago

theres also MemoryPack which doesnt do encoding

NaniorOP•2mo ago

Typically resolver issues, something about revolver not defined in standard resolver, or entirely not found And turned out later that I'd need to use .NET framework instead, because for some reason it didn't wanna work normally when on .NET standard I can't access the project right now so I can't tell what exactly the issue is anymore Um... Idk that package, can try I guess MessagePack is said to be very fast and compact, that's why I used it, but maybe it's not a robust design or something, idk, it just frequently ends up in trouble, mostly issues with custom type resolvers

sibber•2mo ago

ive never used it before personally, but its very popular and seems fairly battle tested so it must be robust it does look somewhat tricky to use in some cases tho tradeoff for performance MemoryPack is made by the same person

Unknown User•2mo ago

Message Not Public

NaniorOP•2mo ago

O.o Well, I had another look at MessagePack's documentation, and I see something I can try next time I work on my project... Might be that for some reason Unity6 doesn't automatically register the generated resolver like when I was trying IL2CPP, so I'll need to include the registry function At least, it sounds like it makes sense When my brother was trying to fix it he insisted that the only solution is to use .NET framework instead, which is why I decided to avoid MessagePack and try write my own

Unknown User•2mo ago

Message Not Public

sibber•2mo ago

but for a game save file how would this happen

Unknown User•2mo ago

Message Not Public

sibber•2mo ago

thats not really a volunrability you can say that about any format

Unknown User•2mo ago

Message Not Public

sibber•2mo ago

it seems to just dump the raw bytes no encoding so the goal is performance if i understood correctly at least

Unknown User•2mo ago

Message Not Public

sibber•2mo ago

oh i dont think they meant cross lang

Unknown User•2mo ago

Message Not Public

sibber•2mo ago

anyway yeah protobuf seems nice for that

Gaming

Programming

Calling static method of interface via it's type