I
iTeachChem•4mo ago
Neko

Will a reaction still be considered at equillibrium if the rate of forward is significantly more

Lets say we have a reaction in which we have a ton of product of which has slow rate of going backwards and a small amount of reactant with a fast rate of forward. The amount of product formation is equal to amount of reactant formed per unit time and the whole system is at balance. Will it still be considered equillibrium?
22 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•4mo ago
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•4mo ago
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•4mo ago
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•4mo ago
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Neko
NekoOP•4mo ago
I meant in the question is that even tho a unit of product will make less amount of reactant compared to same amount of reactand making product, its that it has a lot more quantity of product so it balances out lets say we have measured everything perfectly and have the perfect amount of stuff to make it balance also another question: does a catalyst increase the rate of reaction both forward and backward? @iTeachChem sir please help
iTeachChem
iTeachChem•4mo ago
Yes
Cakey Bot
Cakey Bot•4mo ago
iteachchem
Transcription requested by Neko
I didn't follow this. If you're saying that can there be more products than reactants, absolutely. You know, for reactions where k is greater than 1000, you assume it to almost be complete. Where k is much lesser than 10 power minus 3, you're saying there's no reaction. And in ionic equilibrium, you'll see most reactions having k values of less than 10 power minus 3. And in, say, electrolysis, you'll see all things having such crazy high k values that they're almost complete. Right. So from that point of view, it works. Was that a question?
Neko
NekoOP•4mo ago
that wasnt really my question 😅 just skip the details and lets asumme there is a reaction where the rate of reaction forward and backward isnt same but the system is constant in its mass, concentration etc ignoring how this system is at this kind of balance, will you say its at equillibrium? (even tho rates are different)
iTeachChem
iTeachChem•4mo ago
It can’t be na. If rate is different that itself means that things are changing with time. The definition of equilibrium is when things don’t change with time.
Neko
NekoOP•4mo ago
So youre saying its not possible for a system to have different rates of forward and backward but have every other property like concentration, pressure etc to be same
Neko
NekoOP•4mo ago
Is the rate of a reaction defined for per unit of reactant/product or for all the product/reactant in that system?
iTeachChem
iTeachChem•4mo ago
And equilibrium too shall we close this out? you good?
Neko
NekoOP•4mo ago
please let it be open for some time...... until I study chemical kinetics more
iTeachChem
iTeachChem•3mo ago
padh liya? :D you can find questions once they are closed btw! by just searching them up here with the name of the doubt
Neko
NekoOP•3mo ago
padha toh nahi but you can close it thanks
iTeachChem
iTeachChem•3mo ago
That's okay. You can always find it once closed.
Neko
NekoOP•3mo ago
+solved @iTeachChem
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•3mo ago
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1221350251139432520> (1221350251139432520)
Time
<t:1730995461:R>
Solved by
<@1035556259417571408> (1035556259417571408)

Did you find this page helpful?