Kinda' stunned... do these still look good to you?

2.1 up and running.... a few kinks but I'd printed my old .cfg so was easy to fix the oddball stuff.... first res under 2.1 belts look REALLY good to me.... vibe seems about the same. (between version, so no ill effects on ops... woohoo) The ability to just set a Hz and let the machine vibe while you dance around fingering parts to quell noises is FANTASTIC. ....anyway.... thoughts? flames? suggestions? yes.... I prefer my belts a tad on the tighter side (VC500 3.1 with RoS 2.1)
No description
No description
No description
Solution:
the input request in the loop (to continue the loop or not) is the 'pulse' I'm hearing as you describe. And yes, I do not see it effecting the graph/responses from the printer in the graph. You confirmed my query.... it's not an issue., was simply an observation on my part. tnx
Jump to solution
4 Replies
jolton49
jolton495mo ago
How do you set a constant hz in rates?
ptegler
pteglerOP5mo ago
RO 2.1x now has advanced tuning tools (look at your navigation menu) Once that is running a tools option pops up a window that lets you set a constant (slider adjustable) carriage vibration. Speaking of which @miklschmidt that contant freq...at least on mine.... is it a software loop? I ask as on my printer, i get a secondary pulsing, almost a regular, repeating pattern of 'skips' within what ever vide I'm running.
miklschmidt
miklschmidt5mo ago
is it a software loop?
Yes, no other way to do it. Secondary pulsing? Skips? I don't understand, need to see i t each command oscillates for 500-1000ms. There are pauses in between because klipper isn't realtime and i wait for the request to finish before sending the next one so you can somewhat update the frequency live (still with the huge caveat of klipper queuing/buffering) That pause doesn't impact your results though. Graphs look great btw 👍
Solution
ptegler
ptegler5mo ago
the input request in the loop (to continue the loop or not) is the 'pulse' I'm hearing as you describe. And yes, I do not see it effecting the graph/responses from the printer in the graph. You confirmed my query.... it's not an issue., was simply an observation on my part. tnx

Did you find this page helpful?