12 Replies
@Dexter
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.It is asking about the energy difference between two successive orbitals
Like n1 n2 , n2 and n3
I think the answer should be option b is it?
Isn’t this atomic structure? Anyways
A simple way to see this is yk when u draw the series like lyman balmer and stuff , like as in the diagram? The gap between the lower ones are big and it decreases as u go higher up which shows nothing but the energy gap decrease
Or ofc acc to the formula
Delta E = R Z square x [1/n - 1/n+1] so E decreases as n increases
iteachchem
Transcription requested by stormycloud
या पोटेटो जी बिल्कुल सही बताया आपने और या, मैं उन्हें कमप्लीटली देता हूँ।
iteachchem
Transcription requested by stormycloud
I'd like to add here, you're basically talking about 1 by 1 square minus 1 by 2 square, that's energy gap between 1 and 2, then 1 by 2 square minus 1 by 3 square, that's a gap between 2 and 3, 1 by 3 square minus 1 by 4 square, gap between 3 and 4, which is why it keeps decreasing after point becomes continuous.
ok got it thanks yall
vk jaiswal says otherwise xd, i tried to think of it from a periodic properties perspective which is why i struggled
tunnel vision 💀
Oh
Good to know
👍
+solved @Real potato @iTeachChem @stormycloud
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@925057461893865474> (925057461893865474)
Time
<t:1722156529:R>
Solved by
<@1088352651567173632> (1088352651567173632), <@1035556259417571408> (1035556259417571408), <@821702877721657374> (821702877721657374)