Action expecting two arguments, but context is not passed
This might be a slight misunderstanding from my side about how actions work, but after defining a new action and attempting to call it in the client (it's a create action), it throws an error expecting a second argument (context), but in the examples and elsewhere in the opensaas code I can only see one argument being passed.
12 Replies
Hi @CamBlackwood. I'm kapa.ai, your friendly support bot. I will try to answer your question by searching through the knowledge base. :wave:
----------------------
In Wasp, when you define an action, it expects two arguments:
args
and context
. The args
argument is an object containing the data passed in when calling the action, while context
is an additional context object passed into the action by Wasp. This object contains user session information, as well as information about entities (source (https://wasp-lang.dev/docs/data-model/operations/actions#implementing-actions)).
When you call an action from the client, Wasp automatically provides the context
for you. Therefore, you only need to pass in the args
when calling the action from the client. For example, if you have an action createProject
, you would call it like this: createProject({id: 123})
. Even though the action expects two arguments (args
and context
), you only need to provide the args
when calling it from the client (source (https://discord.com/channels/686873244791210014/1216119302244270181)).
However, if you are calling an action from another action (or from a server-side worker), you need to manually provide the context
as the second argument. This is because Wasp does not automatically provide the context
in this case. The context
you pass should be the same context
that was provided to the calling action by Wasp (source (https://discord.com/channels/686873244791210014/1218567315185209464)).
Here is an example of how you would call an action from another action:
And in backup.ts
:
(source (https://discord.com/channels/686873244791210014/1218567315185209464)).
If you are still encountering issues, it would be helpful to know the exact error message you are seeing and how you are importing and calling the action.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
Sorry @CamBlackwood, I seem to be having a bit of trouble. Don't worry though, I've pinged my support and they will try to fix me up! :technologist:
Perhaps try again in 15mins?@kapa.ai I'm calling it from the client, and it's defined as an action the same as all other actions - I'll try and run wasp clean to see if that fixes it
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
If you're calling the action from the client and it's defined correctly, you shouldn't need to manually pass the
context
argument. Wasp should handle this for you.
However, if you're still encountering issues, running wasp clean
could help. This command cleans the .wasp
and build
directories, which can sometimes resolve issues caused by leftover files from previous builds (source (https://github.com/wasp-lang/wasp/issues/210)).
If the problem persists after running wasp clean
, it would be helpful to see the exact error message you're getting and the code where you're calling the action. This will help in diagnosing the issue.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
Sorry @CamBlackwood, I seem to be having a bit of trouble. Don't worry though, I've pinged my support and they will try to fix me up! :technologist:
Perhaps try again in 15mins?@kapa.ai I still get the issue, here's the action
here is the way I defined it in my main.wasp file
And here's how I call it in the client
Let me check the knowledge base for you. One moment! :books:
----------------------
Your action and its usage seem to be correct. The
context
argument is automatically provided by Wasp when you call the action from the client, so you don't need to pass it manually.
However, the error you're encountering might be due to the async
keyword in your action definition. When you use async
, it means the function returns a Promise. If there's no return
statement in your function, it will return Promise<undefined>
, which might not be what Wasp expects.
If your action doesn't perform any asynchronous operations (like database queries), you can remove the async
keyword:
If your action does perform asynchronous operations, make sure to return a Promise that resolves to the expected type. For example, if AddCreator
is expected to return a Creator
, you might do something like this:
If the problem persists, it would be helpful to see the exact error message you're getting.
----------------------
Note: you can ask me a follow up question by @ mentioning me again :speech_balloon:
----------------------
Sorry @CamBlackwood, I seem to be having a bit of trouble. Don't worry though, I've pinged my support and they will try to fix me up! :technologist:
Perhaps try again in 15mins?I'd suggest checking this out https://wasp-lang.dev/docs/data-model/operations/actions#using-actions
Actions | Wasp
We'll explain what Actions are and how to use them. If you're looking for a detailed API specification, skip ahead to the API Reference.
Thanks @miho - I was using those but missed importing it from operations rather than the actions file. That's sorted the issue 🙂
Ah yes @CamBlackwood that is a bit tricky, people importing it by mistake from operations!
@sodic what are your thoughts on this? I am sure Cam is not the first or last that made this mistake, is there a way we can discourage people from making it? On one hand, we don't want to forbid it completely, as they might want to import stuff directly in some cases, but we do want to also possibly avoid this mistake if possible.
Vite plugin that detects if users tried to import server code on the client? 🙂
Yeah right -> wait @miho , didn't you do some work in that direction?
I did, but we never did anything more than a POC, we should create an issue and prioritise 😄
Ok awesome, @miho since you went the further into this :D, can you create an issue for it and also link to this Discord convo?