✅ Can't Authenticate User
I am working on a small WebApp and I have 3 user types. In my EF DB Migration I defined the following tables: Logins, Users and another table called Roles.
In the Logins table I hold an Id which is the same to the UserId, the email, hashed password and the password salt.
In the Users table I hold all of the user data such as the name and a FK for the role. In the roles table I have an Id and RoleType string. Currently I have the "Standard" role and the "Administrator" role.
I have an overview page for users that are not logged in that should not be visible to authenticated users. And the pages that are accessed by authenticated users are not visible for non-authenticated users. Meanwhile for the administrators I will provide the same pages but I may add more buttons, so the access should be similar (I assume).
I have tried adding a cookie manually with the session, but I don't know how to authorize it. Next I tried adding custom policies, but that didn't work and I wasn't able to access any page. And now I tried adding Identity, but it seems like my Users and Roles tables/models are conflicting with the ones provided by Identity. What should I do?
Here's how a user logs in into my application:
52 Replies
You would have to authorize it yourself
Write authorization middleware, figure out a way how to hook it up to your controllers
Alternatively... strip away your custom auth code and just use Identity
How would you rate the difficulty of this?
Hard to tell, to be honest. I never even tried doing that since Identity fits my needs
Regarding the Identity part. Should I also rename my User and Role models? Or how would my DB architecture change?
You would use Identity's users and roles
That you can customize, of course
But, yes, your database structure would change, Identity would introduce some tables and columns of its own
It's a complete solution, with password reminders, 2FA, and so on
Oh, I see. Well, I implemented the password hashing and salting on my own, I hope I won't have to get rid of that
Identity uses SHA256 for password hashing, and it does the salting as well
You can substitute it for your own, though. I replaced SHA256 with Argon2id
I checked the documentation and it seems like I will still be able to define my user as long as it's named
ApplicationUser
. I am wondering if the User
created by Identity will be replaced by my ApplicationUser or not and how I would be able to link the custom user to the rolesNo, you will be able to define your own user as long as it inherits from
ApplicationUser
It will have all the properties of ApplicationUser
plus properties you yourself defineI'll try using Identity then. Thanks!
for simple custom authorization I return a jwt token from the login endpoint and use the authorize attribute on my controllers Idk what you use for frontend but with blazor you can also use the authorize attribute
I have a classing MVC WebApp automatically generated
I'm not sure if it usez Blazor. All I know is that it supports Razor syntax
But wasn't JWT mostly for APIs?
I guess I'll have to use attribute routing
a okay i have not worked with that but isnt the screenshot you send an api?
I guess it technically is since it's an api endpoint for a login that gets called from the views. But it just doesn't look like the APIs that are completely separate and use swagger
Oh, cool thing about Identity: it scaffolds the login, registration, etc. pages for you
Customizable, of course, but still
Yeah, but weren't the scaffolded logins and registrations MVVM? (or Identity as a whole)
I found this on StackOverflow
What gets scaffolded are Razor Pages
You can have it scaffold API endpoints as well, but they're not customizable yet
Also, you said you're using MVC, so why would you use an API for auth?
Isn't MVC just a coupled API and WebApp?
Since in a way the controllers are just API endpoints that return HTML
Eh, I guess
An API usually means you receive and return JSON
If you receive form data or just requests without data, we usually call it server-side rendering, or SSR
I see.
So I should go for Identity
But would there be a way to get rid of the PasswordHash and Email and other redundant fields from the Identity User?
I have a separate table for storing the user's email and password + salt and I don't think that it's proper to store that data in the User table
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Well, I didn't even have an Authentication stack in place
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Yeah, that's what I was trying to accomplish. I am just unsure on what to use. I want to rewrite as little as possible
I did a DB migration with Identity since I received suggestions to use Identity.
But now I realized that I have lots of redundant fields in my Users table
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
:catgasm:
In my previous architecture I had all of the login data such as the user email and hashed password and salt in a Logins table, with all the remaining user data in a Users table
Just a personal project
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
A MVC app
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
The theme of the app is that it's a library, like an online library of books
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
I did MVC before in Rails
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Yes, I am using .NET8
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
I didn't know that
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
I was wondering why I no longer had to write AJAX for my requets. Maybe that's the answer
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
No
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
I already have the UI part. I would prefer to avoid scaffolding a new UI, if possible. This way I would only lose half of my work instead of all of my work.
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Can't I scaffold into my actual project and check against the previous commits in git? Or would that come with the risk of breaking stuff?
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
I created a project called
Prototype
since I'm kind of prototyping the authentication and authorization.
Regarding the DB. I guess I'll have to get a new local DB going since my current one is on Azure with the free tierUnknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
I'll start following the guide since it's the learn section so there probably wont' be any issues
Should I close the thread or leave it open in case of possible problems that may arise
Unknown User•8mo ago
Message Not Public
Sign In & Join Server To View
Thank you all for the help!