C
C#9mo ago
Mekasu0124

✅ System.Data.SQLite Data Types

I'm wanting to save a float value to a relative database through the package System.Data.SQLite. I've not had to do this yet, and the docs for that package aren't much help.
55 Replies
oke
oke9mo ago
so are you looking for an example...? there isnt really a question
Angius
Angius9mo ago
You'd do it like with any other variable Do you want to use EF or just plain SQL?
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
apologies
public class DatabaseEngine
{
private static readonly string _dbFile = "Data Source=main.db";

public void CreateDb()
{
using SQLiteConnection conn = new(_dbFile);
using SQLiteCommand cmd = conn.CreateCommand();

cmd.CommandText = @"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS
[emplyees] (
[Id] INTEGER,
[FirstName] VARCHAR(2048),
[LastName] VARCHAR(2048),
[Username] VARCHAR(2048),
[Password] VARCHAR(2048),
[PayRate] ";

try
{
conn.Open();
}
}
}
public class DatabaseEngine
{
private static readonly string _dbFile = "Data Source=main.db";

public void CreateDb()
{
using SQLiteConnection conn = new(_dbFile);
using SQLiteCommand cmd = conn.CreateCommand();

cmd.CommandText = @"CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS
[emplyees] (
[Id] INTEGER,
[FirstName] VARCHAR(2048),
[LastName] VARCHAR(2048),
[Username] VARCHAR(2048),
[Password] VARCHAR(2048),
[PayRate] ";

try
{
conn.Open();
}
}
}
this is my code so far PayRate should be a float/double I'm used to saving them as REAL in python sqlite3 markup
Angius
Angius9mo ago
So... do SQLite is SQLite SQL is SQL It doesn't magically gain new types just because you use it with C#
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
ok so then it would be a REAL then
Angius
Angius9mo ago
Yes
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
oh ok. thank you very much 🙂
oke
oke9mo ago
im pretty sure SQLite doesnt have the same datatypes for storage i may be wrong
Angius
Angius9mo ago
The same as what?
oke
oke9mo ago
SQL
Angius
Angius9mo ago
SQL is the language SQLite is the database SQL supports whatever types a given database has
oke
oke9mo ago
i just felt my brain get bigger
Angius
Angius9mo ago
Or rather, every database uses it's own flavour of SQL
Jimmacle
Jimmacle9mo ago
[Password] VARCHAR(2048) :pepesus:
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
O_o what?
oke
oke9mo ago
im sure its encrypted
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
haha ok wait
oke
oke9mo ago
right?
Angius
Angius9mo ago
It better not be encrypted It better be hashed
oke
oke9mo ago
hashed* totally knew that
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
I haven't learned encryption yet in C# and besides it's a locally hosted application. Like the database and files and such are local. Nothing backups online. Not even passwords
Jimmacle
Jimmacle9mo ago
plaintext passwords are always bad
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
I like this dude 😂 ok so then how would I encrypt hash a password? in python, we use salt
Jimmacle
Jimmacle9mo ago
consider someone gets access to your PC and happens to find your database, and in your testing you used the same password you used for online accounts
Angius
Angius9mo ago
SHA256 is supported in .NET by default
oke
oke9mo ago
nah, screw hashing them, just use a SecureString
Angius
Angius9mo ago
And is... sufficient
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
I 100% understand your viewpoint, but my dev database passwords are always Test123! lmao SecureString is sufficient?
Angius
Angius9mo ago
SecureString is obsolete
Jimmacle
Jimmacle9mo ago
securestring is ancient and not recommended
Angius
Angius9mo ago
Deprecated, even
oke
oke9mo ago
but just store it in a json file by serializing the instance
Angius
Angius9mo ago
SHA256 is sufficient
oke
oke9mo ago
we should use KWIC for passwords instead
Angius
Angius9mo ago
Alternatively, use a BCrypt or Argon2id package if you want real security
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
ok I'm looking pulling up some sites on it now and I'll look into it when I get to that part
oke
oke9mo ago
compress the password, base 64 it, then hash it
Angius
Angius9mo ago
why None of that is remotely necessary Salt and hash
oke
oke9mo ago
really confuse hackers, and open up more possibilities
Angius
Angius9mo ago
Yeah nah It's just useless work
oke
oke9mo ago
my intentions are far beyond your understanding
Angius
Angius9mo ago
If you're here just to meme then your intention better be to remove yourself from the conversation
oke
oke9mo ago
ouch
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
side question for you if you don't mind.
public string CreateVersionFile()
{
try
{
Dictionary<string, bool> setupDict = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Dictionary<string, bool>>(_setupPath);

Dictionary<string, string> versionDict = new()
{
{ "version", "1.0.0" }
}

setupDict.Add(versionDict);

var newJsonData = JsonSerializer.Serialize(_setupPath, setupDict);
return versionDict["version"];
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
}
}
public string CreateVersionFile()
{
try
{
Dictionary<string, bool> setupDict = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Dictionary<string, bool>>(_setupPath);

Dictionary<string, string> versionDict = new()
{
{ "version", "1.0.0" }
}

setupDict.Add(versionDict);

var newJsonData = JsonSerializer.Serialize(_setupPath, setupDict);
return versionDict["version"];
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message);
}
}
my goal here is to add a new key value pair to the json file if it doesn't exist (check happens in previous function). I'm still not that familiar on working with a json file, but figured it better for this use case as i didn't see a use in creating a config table in the database folder.
Angius
Angius9mo ago
You want a dictionary of dictionaries? setupDict is a Dictionary<string, bool>
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
well no
Angius
Angius9mo ago
You can't just add a Dictionary<string, string> to it
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
{
"setup": false,
"version": "1.0.0"
}
{
"setup": false,
"version": "1.0.0"
}
is the intended goal
Angius
Angius9mo ago
That is not a dictionary
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
oh so ould it be
Angius
Angius9mo ago
That is an object
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
setupDict["version"] = "1.0.0";
File.WriteAllText(_setupPath, setupDict);
setupDict["version"] = "1.0.0";
File.WriteAllText(_setupPath, setupDict);
Angius
Angius9mo ago
If you want to throw away type safety and use Dictionary<string, object>, sure But I'd recommend an object
class Thingamajig
{
public required bool Setup { get; set; }
public required string Version { get; set; }
}
class Thingamajig
{
public required bool Setup { get; set; }
public required string Version { get; set; }
}
MODiX
MODiX9mo ago
Angius
REPL Result: Success
using System.Text.Json;

class Thingamajig
{
public required bool Setup { get; set; }
public required string Version { get; set; }
}

var json = """
{
"Setup": false,
"Version": "1.0.0"
}
""";

var data = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Thingamajig>(json);
data.Setup = true;
data.Version = "1.0.1+123";

Console.WriteLine(JsonSerializer.Serialize(data));
using System.Text.Json;

class Thingamajig
{
public required bool Setup { get; set; }
public required string Version { get; set; }
}

var json = """
{
"Setup": false,
"Version": "1.0.0"
}
""";

var data = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Thingamajig>(json);
data.Setup = true;
data.Version = "1.0.1+123";

Console.WriteLine(JsonSerializer.Serialize(data));
Console Output
{"Setup":true,"Version":"1.0.1\u002B123"}
{"Setup":true,"Version":"1.0.1\u002B123"}
Compile: 497.158ms | Execution: 44.993ms | React with ❌ to remove this embed.
Mekasu0124
Mekasu0124OP9mo ago
ok cool. brb
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server