Vcore 3.1 Rear Z arm slides down under weight of bed
Just upgraded from 3.0 to 3.1 on the Z axis, with wobbleX.
As per the title the rear z arm slides down by like 15 cm.
I am unable to home properly unless I manually twist the z hold in place and then home. Then the motors get energized and I'm good.
3.0 Z design had a ANTI-BACKLASH NUT BLOCK, that you could tension to stop this from happening.
3.1 doesn't seem to have any such consideration.
Curious many others wouldn't have the same problem, yet I don't see any posts.
Am I missing something, or some part? Much appreciated
![No description](https://cdn.answeroverflow.com/1118043505374277683/353852138_10104350697514827_3367011752216154303_n.jpg)
21 Replies
chech the couplers grub screw
and check if the oldham coupler is screwed in correctly
spring loaded POM nuts solved that for me
![No description](https://cdn.answeroverflow.com/1118180882554032138/image.png)
this is not normal
you should not need and not use these springs at all
this cant be the reason why it went down
thats basically impossible
you must have forget something else
I'm using the wobbleX design here. So there is only the basic POM nut.
GitHub
Interfaces-for-WobbleX-integration/RatRig/VCore3.1 at main · Mirage...
CADs and STLs that can be adapted to various 3D printers in order to benefit from the best Z wobble management system. - Interfaces-for-WobbleX-integration/RatRig/VCore3.1 at main · MirageC79/Inter...
![No description](https://cdn.answeroverflow.com/1118356957208789072/image.png)
Maybe I will have to try this
trust me, on a v-core, the ratrig oldham couplers are superior
i do also spot misaligned leadscrews
and btw, you CAN NOT use the oldhams on the wobble x arms
thats not possible
thats the reason why it went down
you need to use the original ratrig arms, where you can screw down the oldhams to the arm
you didnt do that
this is not working
![No description](https://cdn.answeroverflow.com/1118359989875114084/D2DColIJRIiwgb23.png)
you see that, there are two screws that mount the oldham to the arm
without that it will never work
i highly suggest to stick with the stock configuration for the arms
Very interesting. I thought the WobbleX was superior to the stock oldhams...
they are not
The two screws with the Radial Ball Bearing at the top I am still using. Just not the oldham couple.
So you have no z artifacts at all with the stock step with a tall print?
With input shaping on?
well, you can do whatever you want, but mixing wobble arsm and oldhams doesnt work. they are jsut incompatible
i can clearly see in your photo that you havent screwd the oldhams down