Has anyone tested hyperdrive on postgres
Has anyone tested hyperdrive on postgres:17? 🤔 Seeing some issues and trying to rule-out possible cases
4 Replies
What sorts of issues?
I haven't done a ton of testing personally, we had targeted 16 at launch. I believe some of the team have used 17 with it but can confirm Monday
Was trying to set a hyperdrive connection to an aws rds instance.
It's set as a public database and I'm able to connect to it from my local dev env and run migrations, for example, or connect with a database GUI.
but when seeting that same connection string fails with a
Network connection to the provided database timed out. [code: 2020]
Initially was trying with postgres 17, and saw that officially only 16 was supported.
So thought that version might've been the issue, but started a new DB on 16 and same issue.
Turns out it was VPC security group limiting access, had to allow for a broader set of IPs
Will try tunneling in a bit, much appreciated 😄Glad to hear it! I just popped on and noticed that the Neon I did all the benchmarking for the recent blog on happened to be 17, apparently they rolled the defaults. So yeah, 17 has worked fine for me thus far. I'm going to roll our test suite over to it too, I think.
Good luck, feel free to ping here again if you need anything!
FYI @thomasgauvin with the test suite rolled I'm comfortable updating the docs to note 17 as officially supported. Lmk if there's anything else you'd like to see beforehand.
great, opened the pr https://github.com/cloudflare/cloudflare-docs/pull/21671