Basic Periodicity Doubt

They have given enthalpy=602 and first electron affinity=-enthalpy=-141. So shouldn't (based on the data given), the second electron affinity be -462?
No description
23 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Gyro Gearloose
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
Oh crap, meant to select chem.
Opt
Opt7d ago
What website is this btw?
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
The coaching one.
Opt
Opt7d ago
Oh
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
Like, it does have errors many-a-times.
Azura
Azura7d ago
its second one na
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
Can you elaborate?
Azura
Azura7d ago
hold on a sec lemme confirm if my logic is right ahh wait a sec the energy req to remove both the e is 603 and the energy needed to add one e is 141
Opt
Opt7d ago
Remove both electrons??
Azura
Azura7d ago
yh it should be d weird its o2-
Opt
Opt7d ago
It's starting from O Anyways, I also got d This is weird
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
Ig they put affinity instead of enthalpy for removal of 1e-
Azura
Azura7d ago
wait a sec we hve to turn o- to 02- here
Opt
Opt7d ago
It should be EGE yeah, because it's going to become more stable. So proceeds via loss of energy
Azura
Azura7d ago
so both will be added na? so tht way it should be a to add 2 e in O the energy is 603 and to add one is 141 but to go from O- to O2- we have to add na both enthaply
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
That gives this, I think.
No description
Azura
Azura7d ago
are 141 minus me hai usko rearrnge karoge to + hogs.
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
Shouldn't it be like affinity is -141, so enthalpy would be - of that?
Azura
Azura7d ago
.. hnn
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLacOP7d ago
+solved @Azura @Opt
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1075951732460376214> (1075951732460376214)
Time
<t:1743598240:R>
Solved by
<@888280831863451688> (888280831863451688), <@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892)

Did you find this page helpful?