Cloudflare Developers•5w ago

i just realized this could be used as a

i just realized this could be used as a centralized auth server no? have an array of allowed service names (for the stub) and voila anyways i should probably add docs on better-auth for this. no more d1 just for auth

17 Replies

dan•5w ago

not sure i have context on what the service names/sub are but yeah it does seem a bit heavy to have an auth db in every DO when there's likely just gonna be one row in it

SilvanOP•5w ago

*stub sorry

dan•5w ago

you mean an array of authorized stub ids?

SilvanOP•5w ago

basically yes

dan•5w ago

yeah i was thinking about this the other day, i think the DOs themselves should have no knowledge of any auth just call them in an authenticated context i'm about to implement this actually, shipping an agent to my app that users can spin up, i'll just keep a record of users_agents with user_ids and the DO stub ids and do my authorization that way

SilvanOP•5w ago

was actually considering this too lol how exactly do you mean this?

dan•5w ago

like i think the DO itself should just run without any context of auth auth just happens before

SilvanOP•5w ago

oh as in the client does worker -> DO and the worker decides if you are allowed or not

dan•5w ago

yeah

SilvanOP•5w ago

yea thats how my current Ai app works too

plgingras88•5w ago

Weird I was about to tackle this exact same scenario with worker and DO and better auth and i was thinking pretty much the same : the worker should manage auth then allow or block DO calls. I however may need to pass a permissions object to the DO to manage granular level actions on the DO end though. Thanks for sharing your discoveries and experiments !

SilvanOP•5w ago

Yea most likely smarter. this was my simple solution to it

app.use('*', async (c, next) => {
  const session = await auth(drizzle(c.env.DB)).api.getSession({
    headers: c.req.raw.headers,
  });

  if (!session) {
    c.set('user', null);
    c.set('session', null);
    return next();
  }

  c.set('user', session.user);
  c.set('session', session.session);

  return next();
});

app.on(['POST', 'GET'], '/api/auth/**', (c) =>
  auth(drizzle(c.env.DB)).handler(c.req.raw)
);

app.use(
  '*',
  createMiddleware(
    async (c, next) =>
      await agentsMiddleware({
        options: {
          onBeforeConnect: () => {
            if (!c.get('user'))
              return new Response('Unauthorized', { status: 401 });
          },
        },
        onError: (error) => {
          console.error(error);
        },
      })(c, next)
  )
);

app.use('*', async (c, next) => {
  const session = await auth(drizzle(c.env.DB)).api.getSession({
    headers: c.req.raw.headers,
  });

  if (!session) {
    c.set('user', null);
    c.set('session', null);
    return next();
  }

  c.set('user', session.user);
  c.set('session', session.session);

  return next();
});

app.on(['POST', 'GET'], '/api/auth/**', (c) =>
  auth(drizzle(c.env.DB)).handler(c.req.raw)
);

app.use(
  '*',
  createMiddleware(
    async (c, next) =>
      await agentsMiddleware({
        options: {
          onBeforeConnect: () => {
            if (!c.get('user'))
              return new Response('Unauthorized', { status: 401 });
          },
        },
        onError: (error) => {
          console.error(error);
        },
      })(c, next)
  )
);

plgingras88•5w ago

This deserves a live pic of my red cat blocking me from coding.

SilvanOP•5w ago

relatable

plgingras88•5w ago

No fuckin way, they are all the same loll. And I am a svelte fan too. You clone haha !!

dan•5w ago

no orange but also cat-blocked

Gaming

Programming

i just realized this could be used as a

Did you find this page helpful?