Why No Clemmensen Reduction on Carboxylic acid

i was wandering, why clemmensen reagent can't reduce carboxylic acid, isn't it just about giving H+ from HCl and electron by Zn-Hg, what i'm missing
45 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
carbonyl double bond O does not act the same as carboxylic acid double bond O the characteristic feature of a carboxylic acid is that the =O is in resonance with its own -OH group which is what give it its properties, like insane acidity it does not act like a normal carbonyl if ur asking the mechanism of clemmensen then no clue
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
so we can't reduce it directly how about using amine with heat to create amide then do hydrolysis
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
you want to remove the double bond O from carboxylic acid right does LAH do that?
Opt
Opt5w ago
It's actually not confirmed. Like Cannizarro rxn
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
COOH to OH
Opt
Opt5w ago
Yup
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
oh tf? we were taught a mechanism for cannizarro
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
oh i remember even H2/Ni with heat can do it
Opt
Opt5w ago
LAH would reduce hydrogen if it could, ngl
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
directly
Opt
Opt5w ago
It's just a proposed mechanism
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
lmao huh ok how do they confirm mechanisms if its in dispute
Opt
Opt5w ago
But iirc the most common proposed mechanism for clemmensen starts with protonation of carbonyl O Which will not happen in COOH So there you go, that logic works
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
very cool
Opt
Opt5w ago
They figure out a compound A that would give a certain result if Mechanism X were correct. Prepare A, perform reaction on A, see if required result is observed.
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
ahh
Opt
Opt5w ago
No description
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
bro but what about about Aac1 mechanism we added HCl it will for H2O(+)-C(=O)-R can't we do it like that?
Opt
Opt5w ago
So, by this mechanism, Clemmen redn can't reduce COOH because it's actually going to be a resonance hybrid of COO(-) The what mechanism now?
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
Aac1 is about acyl bond
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
that is what defines carboxylic acids right, makes them something more than just a carbonyl and an alcohol also i am very bad at mechanism names
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
it's not a mechanism for mains it's for (tough category) advanced and olympiads normally
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
ah
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
@Opt apparently its this
No description
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
small picture my bad
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
do it come in mains? yeah talking about this mechanism
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
its not in ncert so no never even seen that before wtf is that triple bonded oxygen cursed af
Opt
Opt5w ago
The heck the what now? Huh
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
"stable cation"? the oxygen is triple bonded the O X Y G E N how is this real
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
that's coz OH took H+ then + was stable at C due to benzene and attacking is bit easy
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
ok we both have no clue you might need to ask a separate doubt for this
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
that's just equilibrium thing double triple nothing much i'm asking why clemmensen can't do still
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
acha
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
the mechanism i told you was all i was talking about to inform you that OH can take H+
Opt
Opt5w ago
I sent it up there a bit back Protonation won't occur on carboxylic oxygen
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
^^ the resonance in COOH affects things
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
if Aac1 can happen that it should too isn't it?
Opt
Opt5w ago
Yeah, but why is Clemmensen going to take place by Aac1 is my question? It's experimental And apparently, it doesn't occur by Aac1
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
this isnt very answerable because scientists dont know the confirmed mechanism of clemmensen lol the one Opt sent is just a theory
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
hmm, fir toh maan ke hi chalna padega
Nimboi
Nimboi5w ago
the curiosity is commendable keep it up
Senku
SenkuOP5w ago
thanks +solved @Nimboi @Opt
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1113849467695792140> (1113849467695792140)
Time
<t:1741269448:R>
Solved by
<@717724055217635398> (717724055217635398), <@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892)

Did you find this page helpful?