binomial 2

No description
29 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•2w ago
@Apu
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
no approach in mind 💀
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•2w ago
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•2w ago
Use sum of agp formula To simplify ig.
TeXit
TeXit•2w ago
Opt
No description
Opt
Opt•2w ago
I think that works No wait That's wrong I'm dumb
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•2w ago
Wouldn't that give binomial thingies as coeff?
Opt
Opt•2w ago
d/dx of GP mb Now expand maybe? I really don't want to
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
i got n(n+2)(2n-1)/12 from my approach but that not even in options 😭 i simply observed that coeff must be n(1)+ 1(n-1) +2(n-2) + 3(n-3).......2(n-2)+1(n-1)+n(1)
Opt
Opt•2w ago
what? Huh? Oh wait I can simplify this so much We can add 1 to GP without any changes Because d/dx of 1 = 0
Opt
Opt•2w ago
No description
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
calculus ke alawa koi aur algebraic approach for sum of series i wrote above
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•2w ago
Oh right this is more effecient ig.
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
how to find sum tho
Opt
Opt•2w ago
I didn't understand your logic.
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
i just wrote down the expression and observed in how many ways can i get x^n x^0 * x^n x^1 * x^n-1 x^2 * x^n-2 .... x^n-1x^1 x^n x^0 multiplied their coeffs and sum
Opt
Opt•2w ago
But finding the sum is just 2n+∑k(n-k) in which you can split the summation into sum of integers and sum of integers squares. Oh yeah that can do
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
sum nahi aa rha na par somehow terms kholi toh dikha n+n+2n+3n..... -(1+4+9+16....) 1. theres two n 2. not able to grasp the end terms of the two series
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•2w ago
Im getting A from the sum The multinomial coeffecient must look like 2!/1!1!*(k^1)(n-k)^1 for k=1,2,...[n/2] So the sum of these must look like sigma (k)(n-k) +2n (as coeffecient of x^0 is NOT 0)
Opt
Opt•2w ago
A na? Yup
Opt
Opt•2w ago
No description
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
ohh got it wait wait yeh kaise aaya i got from my classic approach but multi wale se kaise
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•2w ago
Basically the power is 2 so if one term is of the type x^k, the other one must be x^(n-k). Now write the multinomial coeffecient for this and sum this over from k=0 to k=[n/2]. Now since we want to avoid [n/2], it is better to sum this up to n and then divide by 2. But this method means coeffecient of x^0 is 0 which is not our case so add 2n to this too
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
power of what is 2 ?
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•2w ago
(1+x+2x^2+...) wala thing
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
i dont understand multinomial coefficient kaise likha from what i understand about multinomial in (x+y+z)^n coefficient of x^a y^b z^c (where a+b+c=n) is n!/a!b!c! can u explain along the lines of this
SirLancelotDuLac
SirLancelotDuLac•2w ago
Ye. Here the value of n=2, so either two terms are 1 or one term is 2 and the rest are 0's. Now since both the terms must multiply upto x^n, you get the case when two terms are 1 and rest are zero for the two terms whose power is 1 as x^k and x^(n-k) Now there is a slight conundrum when n is even and you can have a term with power 2 which is (n/2)x^(n/2). To avoid this thing, this is written.
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP•2w ago
ill manage with my classic approach 💀 thanx for the effort tho +solved @Opt @SirLancelotDuLac
iTeachChem Helper
iTeachChem Helper•2w ago
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@741159941934415883> (741159941934415883)
Time
<t:1740492502:R>
Solved by
<@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892), <@1075951732460376214> (1075951732460376214)

Did you find this page helpful?