14 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Gyro Gearloose
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2w ago
Where am I going wrong
No description
SirLancelotDuLac
f=1/2l*sqrt(T.l/m) since T=k.l, we have f=0.5sqrt(k/m), so it is independant of change in length Therefore, ratio is 1.
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2w ago
Ans is 1.4 tho Also it's mentioned that tension is proportional to elongation , I ignored that fact. thus the discrepancy in answer ??
SirLancelotDuLac
Ah me so blind🤦‍♂️ . Tension is proportional to elongation and not length So, place T=kΔl and not l Just place the values and you get 1.4 ig.
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2w ago
if it werent mentioned , would my ans be correct
SirLancelotDuLac
The tension portion? It would be better to use mass of the wire as it remains constant Ah sorry, it would be correct yes. In fact, your solution is correct. They asked the ratio of frequencies which is 1/0.72=1.4 (inverse ratio of wavelengths)
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2w ago
meine bhi toh ratio of frequencies hi nikala hai n1/n2 how are they related?? oh wait , soln mein n2/n1 hi hai which makes sense n2/n1= 1.4 n1/n2=0.72 but why would they find n2/n1 and not n1/n2
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2w ago
any set logic or smthing? anyone../
Dexter
Dexter2w ago
lemme see this seems ok Maybe solution galat hai f = V/2L is the universal formula for a string joint at two ends and fundamental mode V = √T/u can depend ig
hardcoreisdead
hardcoreisdeadOP2w ago
nah ans key mein mere ans ka just reciprocal hai +solved @Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@741159941934415883> (741159941934415883)
Time
<t:1740338839:R>
Solved by
<@1095655769376034818> (1095655769376034818)

Did you find this page helpful?