C#•2mo ago

Test setters indirectly via constructor or test them directly?

Title 🙂

16 Replies

Context 🙂

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

I am testing a customer class, which has some properties such as CompanyName this setter just checks for null and empty, ... But some setters such as PhoneNumber or VatNumber check if they are valid through regex. Do I test these setters of the properties through the constructor (indirectly) or test them directly, making a seperate test method for each?

canton7•2mo ago

I'd test them explicitly. If the class was later refactored so that validation was done in the ctor but not the setter, then you'd want the tests to start failing

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

Gotcha I get you in that sense. But I am not using a constructor 😬 , using object initializers. In the properties we either use Guard.Against.NullOrEmpty(value) or Guard.Against.ValidVatNumber(value)

canton7•2mo ago

So how would you go about testing the properties via the constructor, if they're not set by the constructor? This is where actually asking a detailed question, which includes relevant code, is useful (instead of just a single short sentence)

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

Oh I mean constructor/object initializer my bad

canton7•2mo ago

Then it makes no difference. Setting a property from an object initialiser is identical to setting it explicitly after (barring init, required, etc)

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

Gotcha, so I can choose whether I do it in a test with the whole initializer or seperate setters? What would you do? Certainly one approach would be cleaner than the other no?

canton7•2mo ago

An object initialiser is literally just syntactic sugar for setting the properties one-by-one (again, ignoring init and required). https://sharplab.io/#v2:EYLgxg9gTgpgtADwGwBYA+A3AhlABAMwEZcBeXAOxgHdcAxCCACgEpcBvXAQVN0IBpcAIR4AiAEwjcAXwDcAWABQi7HnxielGvSbN5CtQDpuZQnsPCy4kXsUABddsVtFuV7lsBmXAEtyAFy52XABzGD8ZXABnMIipFzdPd0IABiEg0PComOlFOKV8xSA

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

Yes, thanks, object is firstly made with constructor then after all properties setters are being called But still the question remains what is cleaner, testing setters seperatly or the using the initializer? I am not sure what would you do? I think it will become cluttered testing through initializer cause I do have some required props

canton7•2mo ago

It depends on how the objects are normally constructed, what the tests look like, whether any properties are required/init-only, etc It's pretty much the same question as to whether to initialise any old object using an object initialiser or by manually setting the properties one-by-one It's a judgement call. If you give me two code snippets I can say which I find easiest to read, but it's hard to say anything more specific

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

Most of the properties are required, a typical initializer looks like:

new() {
    ShippingAddress=addresses[0],
    BillingAddress=addresses[1],
    CompanyName="Tech Corp",
    ContactPerson="John Doe",
    VatNumber="FR0817544902",
    EmailAddress=new("[email protected]"),
    PhoneNumber="+33 123456789"
},

new() {
    ShippingAddress=addresses[0],
    BillingAddress=addresses[1],
    CompanyName="Tech Corp",
    ContactPerson="John Doe",
    VatNumber="FR0817544902",
    EmailAddress=new("[email protected]"),
    PhoneNumber="+33 123456789"
},

canton7•2mo ago

Well, required properties can only be set from an initialiser, so question answered?

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

Oh True damn haha Thanks But I still could test them after initialization Thanks for the insights What I could do is do a constructor for the test class that does the setup for the tests and then test the setters individually, I think it will look a lot cleaner if you look above the initializer is quite large, what do you think?

canton7•2mo ago

Whatever is cleanest and most obvious to read

Jiry_XDOP•2mo ago

Okay thanks 😉 , really appreciate the help

Gaming

Programming

Test setters indirectly via constructor or test them directly?