Prisma•2mo ago

Argument `where` of type *WhereUniqueInput needs at least one of `id` arguments.

No TS or linting warnings, and yet I am running into a problem with a simple update query. Relevant query:

ctx.db.table.update({
            where: {
              id: table.id,
            },
            data: {
              relief: {
                disconnect: true,
              },
              dealer: {
                connect: table.relief ? { id: table.relief.id } : undefined,
              },
              dealerStartTime: new Date(),
            },
          }),

ctx.db.table.update({
            where: {
              id: table.id,
            },
            data: {
              relief: {
                disconnect: true,
              },
              dealer: {
                connect: table.relief ? { id: table.relief.id } : undefined,
              },
              dealerStartTime: new Date(),
            },
          }),

Log of input provided to query before calling it:

[ { id: 57, relief: { id: 201 }, dealer: null } ]

[ { id: 57, relief: { id: 201 }, dealer: null } ]

Log of error:

PrismaClientValidationError: 
Invalid `prisma.table.update()` invocation:

{
  where: {
    id: 57,
?   AND?: DealerWhereInput | DealerWhereInput[],
?   OR?: DealerWhereInput[],
?   NOT?: DealerWhereInput | DealerWhereInput[],
?   name?: StringFilter | String,
?   startTime?: DateTimeFilter | DateTime,
?   breakStartTime?: DateTimeNullableFilter | DateTime | Null,
?   gamesKnown?: GameListRelationFilter,
?   table?: TableNullableRelationFilter | TableWhereInput | Null,
?   goingTo?: TableNullableRelationFilter | TableWhereInput | Null
  },
  data: {
    relief: {
      disconnect: true
    },
    dealer: {
      connect: {
        id: 201
      }
    },
    dealerStartTime: new Date("2024-10-17T21:08:47.547Z")
  }
}

Argument `where` of type DealerWhereUniqueInput needs at least one of `id` arguments. Available options are marked with ?.

PrismaClientValidationError: 
Invalid `prisma.table.update()` invocation:

{
  where: {
    id: 57,
?   AND?: DealerWhereInput | DealerWhereInput[],
?   OR?: DealerWhereInput[],
?   NOT?: DealerWhereInput | DealerWhereInput[],
?   name?: StringFilter | String,
?   startTime?: DateTimeFilter | DateTime,
?   breakStartTime?: DateTimeNullableFilter | DateTime | Null,
?   gamesKnown?: GameListRelationFilter,
?   table?: TableNullableRelationFilter | TableWhereInput | Null,
?   goingTo?: TableNullableRelationFilter | TableWhereInput | Null
  },
  data: {
    relief: {
      disconnect: true
    },
    dealer: {
      connect: {
        id: 201
      }
    },
    dealerStartTime: new Date("2024-10-17T21:08:47.547Z")
  }
}

Argument `where` of type DealerWhereUniqueInput needs at least one of `id` arguments. Available options are marked with ?.

Even inside the error thrown, it is apparent that an id is indeed being passed. I'm not sure where to go from here, it seems very simple so maybe I'm missing something?

Solution:

after digging on how to enable debug logs for prisma, i found out that it was another query responsible.

Jump to solution

7 Replies

b0ngl0rdOP•2mo ago

just in case this is helpful

Nurul•2mo ago

Hey @b0ngl0rd 👋 What is the value of table variable here?

where: {
              id: table.id,
            },

where: {
              id: table.id,
            },

Is the value of table this: [ { id: 57, relief: { id: 201 }, dealer: null } ]?

b0ngl0rdOP•2mo ago

It's the object inside that array, yes. In the bigger picture, this is a piece of a transaction, hence the array. However, the error points to this exact query.

Nurul•2mo ago

Can you share the dealer model?

b0ngl0rdOP•2mo ago

model Dealer {
  id             Int       @id @default(autoincrement())
  name           String
  gamesKnown     Game[]
  startTime      DateTime
  breakStartTime DateTime?
  table          Table?    @relation("dealer")
  goingTo        Table?    @relation("relief")
}

model Dealer {
  id             Int       @id @default(autoincrement())
  name           String
  gamesKnown     Game[]
  startTime      DateTime
  breakStartTime DateTime?
  table          Table?    @relation("dealer")
  goingTo        Table?    @relation("relief")
}

model Table {
  id              Int       @id @default(autoincrement())
  tableNum        Int
  game            Game      @relation(fields: [gameId], references: [id])
  gameId          Int
  dealer          Dealer?   @relation("dealer", fields: [dealerId], references: [id])
  dealerId        Int?      @unique
  dealerStartTime DateTime?
  relief          Dealer?   @relation("relief", fields: [reliefId], references: [id])
  reliefId        Int?      @unique
}

model Table {
  id              Int       @id @default(autoincrement())
  tableNum        Int
  game            Game      @relation(fields: [gameId], references: [id])
  gameId          Int
  dealer          Dealer?   @relation("dealer", fields: [dealerId], references: [id])
  dealerId        Int?      @unique
  dealerStartTime DateTime?
  relief          Dealer?   @relation("relief", fields: [reliefId], references: [id])
  reliefId        Int?      @unique
}

so it turns out that prisma won't always return the correct query responsible for throwing an error when processing a transaction.

Solution

b0ngl0rd•2mo ago

after digging on how to enable debug logs for prisma, i found out that it was another query responsible.

b0ngl0rdOP•2mo ago

prisma:client prisma.dealer.update({
  where: {
    id: undefined
  },
  data: {
    breakStartTime: new Date("2024-10-18T21:00:01.763Z"),
    table: {
      disconnect: true
    }
  }
})

prisma:client prisma.dealer.update({
  where: {
    id: undefined
  },
  data: {
    breakStartTime: new Date("2024-10-18T21:00:01.763Z"),
    table: {
      disconnect: true
    }
  }
})

is the cause. so this is because i misunderstood the docs or something on how to make a query optional. looks like prisma only reports the first in the batch as the problem, when it could be any of them.

Gaming

Programming

Argument `where` of type *WhereUniqueInput needs at least one of `id` arguments.