C#•3mo ago

Non-Nullable type "required" double up.

Hi Guys, I'm creating a model for use with Entity Framework, VSCode is yelling at me because a property doesn't have "required", but I do have it in the square brackets above. Do these two different versions of "required" overlap? or do they genuinely serve different purposes?

18 Replies

jcotton42•3mo ago

They're different, the latter enforces that the prop be set by a constructor or object initializer. The former, [Required], is metadata read by stuff like EF. It predates the required keyword and is not looked at by the compiler. EF only looks at [Required]. With that said You have nullable-reference types on, and EF does look at that, so string by itself implies non-null to EF. The [Required] is redundant. @FraznoFire If you wanted SerialNo to be nullable, you'd use string? instead of string.

FraznoFire•3mo ago

Oh so anything that doesn't have <T>? is practically the same as [Required] as far as EF is concerned?

jcotton42•3mo ago

Yes, T implies not nullable, T? implies nullable.

jcotton42•3mo ago

I reccomend you give this article a read https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/ef/core/modeling/

Creating and Configuring a Model - EF Core

Overview of creating and configuring a Entity Framework Core model via Fluent API, Data Annotations and conventions.

FraznoFire•3mo ago

Will do, thank you!

jcotton42•3mo ago

Also, I personally lean towards the fluent API for model config over the attributes. It's more flexible, and can do everything attributes can, but attributes can't necessarily do everything the fluent api can.

FraznoFire•3mo ago

So if I wanted to use attributes like [Key] and [DatabaseGeneratedOption...], there are FluentAPI options available for that as well?

jcotton42•3mo ago

For keys, unless you need a compound key, it can be inferred by convention if you named the key column Id or FooId (where Foo is the table name). But, to answer your question, yes.

FraznoFire•3mo ago

When the docs mention using FluentAPI by creating an override method to override the model builder, where do I put that? inside the model itself?

jcotton42•3mo ago

OnModelCreating is in the dbcontext, if that's what you mean from the article

internal class MyContext : DbContext
{
    public DbSet<Blog> Blogs { get; set; }

    #region Required
    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Blog>()
            .Property(b => b.Url)
            .IsRequired();
    }
    #endregion
}

internal class MyContext : DbContext
{
    public DbSet<Blog> Blogs { get; set; }

    #region Required
    protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder)
    {
        modelBuilder.Entity<Blog>()
            .Property(b => b.Url)
            .IsRequired();
    }
    #endregion
}

FraznoFire•3mo ago

ah ok, I might stick with the Data Annotations for the time being because at least for me it's a bit easier to keep track of, since it's in the same place as the model itself

jcotton42•3mo ago

You can do that with fluent though. Keep reading 🙂

FraznoFire•3mo ago

I can't find anything that says you can do it outside of the dbcontext

jcotton42•3mo ago

"Grouping configuration"

FraznoFire•3mo ago

That looks to be a bit out of my depth for the moment, but I will keep it as a reference for the future, thanks for your help! Actually, why does it complain about having ‘string’ without a ‘required’, but doesn’t care about other types like GUID?

Cortex•3mo ago

wondering the same tbh. its always string

Natashi•3mo ago

Guid is a value type

jcotton42•3mo ago

Guid is a value type (if you at the docs you’ll see it’s a struct, not a class) and value types cannot be null without the ? stuff. Their default value is the zero value.

Gaming

Programming

Non-Nullable type "required" double up.