Cache Rules Indicates a sequence problem
According to the previous experience of page rules, I may add a Cache of all the rules, as shown in the figure I named "Cache", and then I created a new No Cache, and put some second-level domain names or do not want to have a cache in it. It looks like the first one on the list is No Cache and the second one is Cache. But in fact, if I access the second-level domain in my No cache, it is still fully cached.
7 Replies
Do you maybe want
Hostname instead of URI Full?So, No cache, for example:
blog.example.com
I want to bypass the cache, should use hostname instead of the URI Full?
Yes, since URI Full on
blog.example.com would only match if a request is for that exactly, which would never happen, since at minimum you would have a protocol(http: or https:) and a path(/)
So go with Hostname blog.example.comwhat? Then I don't understand. Does this "contains" not include?
Oh... I guess that would work, though I would think it is simpler to just go hostname
Since that explicitly covers what you want
OK, I'll try
Either way, I tried. It's my other problems that are causing what I think is this problem.