Ryzen CPU server performance
Before I lock into purchasing a new cpu for my dedicated machine, how good do you think a server running off of a Ryzen 9 7950x single core would be? Say for example 10-20 players exploring, would a single core be proficient? Trying to find the best cpu for price performance and how many servers it can host at once, looked at this cpu for its single threaded specs.
15 Replies
Thanks for asking your question!
Make sure to provide as much helpful information as possible such as logs/what you tried and what your exact issue is
Make sure to mark solved when issue is solved!!!
/close
!close
!solved
!answered
Requested by mooregaming1324#0
If you have any other cpus I should look at then please share!
If you are focusing on single threaded Minecraft performance usually higher the GHz and memory speed the better
Obviously you’ll still want more than a couple cores to handle things that can be offloaded
How much would allocating just a single core hurt the performance? What would be a good number of cores for a decent server? Was hoping to be able to run up to 12-15 small decent servers off of it, giving more cores to the hefty servers (cpu model has 16 cores 32 threads, ram is planned on ddr5)
If you want a performance comparison I would look at shared hosts that offer dedicated threads. You’ll get similar performance to those models. It really depends on what you’re trying to do.
If you wanted to do some Folia implementation on a 100k world you would need a lot more than a single dedicated thread
But if it was a small rotating minigames server it would work well
The processor itself you are talking about is really good
Also if you’re going to run 12-15 separate servers you might need some dedicated IPs for that.
Servers im setting up are not permanent, just basically handing out small sections to friends or people to use as low playercount smps, events, and other things, no largescale velocity or folia projects in mind, or at least not yet. But wdym need some dedicated ips? Different domains? Systems?
No
Ghz is not a good method of comparing
Like at all
Wait your telling me a higher GHz CPU core isn’t going to perform better than one at lower speeds and similar architecture
Ofc architecture matters but op didn’t say he was going to use an Intel Pentium
ghz is pretty much irrelevant for mc cpus
So then what is relevant
singlethreaded performance
Right
the "myth" of clock speed being the sole performance factor has been disproven several times
e.g. Apple being the most famous example that often compared a lower clock speed PowerPC to the newer Pentium 3/4 line ups from IBM and similar.
Which the speed is then determined by clock speeds architecture etc no?
I understand it’s nuanced
post closed!
The post/thread has been closed!
Requested by mooregaming1324#0