Any user of ST's NUCLEO-32 (32-Pin MCU)?
Any user of ST's NUCLEO-32 (32-Pin MCU)? I found out today their port pins are not matching across nucleo-32 (NANO form factor) series with standard Arduino nano. Also, the USB connector is positioned at the opposite end (when trying to make pin-compatible). I didn't expect this surprise when they said the NUCLEO-32 series has pin compatibility with NANO. Also, the length was 50 mm (too long to replace a standard Arduino nano on a custom PCB). Does anyone here share a similar experience?
Solution:Jump to solution
Yea @Umesh Lokhande I've encountered the same issue. I tried to replace an Arduino Nano with a NUCLEO-32 on a custom board and it didn't fit due to the different pin mapping and the USB connector placement. The extra length was also a problem. It seems "pin compatibility" only refers to the signal names and not the actual physical placement.
2 Replies
Solution
Yea @Umesh Lokhande I've encountered the same issue. I tried to replace an Arduino Nano with a NUCLEO-32 on a custom board and it didn't fit due to the different pin mapping and the USB connector placement. The extra length was also a problem. It seems "pin compatibility" only refers to the signal names and not the actual physical placement.
Hi @RED HAT Yes, I've to redesign PCB for NUCLEO-32 (STM32F303K8). I wish there could be any readymade stm32 module with a standard size of Nano 43.16 x 17.77 mm. I think even STM32 Bluepills/Blackpills are around 50 mm+ in length. Thanks by the way for confirmation.