limits
In this question why do we take 4 as f(2) , just because f(2) is 4 that does not mean all 4 are f(2) and it's not specified any where if that 4 is constant or fn. Ans is 16 only comes when we take 4 as a fn
12 Replies
@Apu
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.Are u actually serious
Or
Are u trying to troll here ?
When data is specified we don't tamper with it
See if a function is a defined
Every object has only one image and every image has only 1 corresponding object
Since f(2) = 4 and f is a function
4 would trace back to f(2) itself
That makes no sense 4 should be treated as a constant
Why don't we then write 2 as f(2)/2 as well
Yes exactly so 4 is a constant
you can do that in this case
Does ur brain not comprehend what I just explained ?
It's so clearly explained
It clearly makes sense
can do? or were u trying to say cant
can't oops
ok , i think i get it now
+solved @Max_34561 @! SKULLxCRUSHER
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@700658749416669194> (700658749416669194)
Time
<t:1719819720:R>
Solved by
<@1076440088822689848> (1076440088822689848), <@742254253975928882> (742254253975928882)