I
iTeachChem8mo ago
Opt

Explain please.

One solution of the equation is trivial, x=1. I have no clue what the other is and can't seem to calculate it either.
No description
31 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Apu
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Deleted User
Deleted User8mo ago
hint: differentiate the function once. now check at which intervals it increases or decreases. you are supposed to check atleast 1 of the solutions intuitively. now try to make a rough graph (only qualitivative)......and i think you should get it. you can try once on your own.
iTeachChem
iTeachChem7mo ago
@Opt were you able to figure it out from here?
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Nope. And I totally forgot about it.
Comrade Rock Astley
It's hard to figure out the other solution exactly with paper, since natural log is involved Like Thanos said you have to graph it
πrate
πrate7mo ago
same lol i solved it but completely forgot posting a solution, sorry. This is a very well framed question. Just look at the slope, it is zero at one point, positive before that and negative after. f(x) itself tends to -infinity as x tends to infinity ( -2023x decreases a lot faster for big value of x, logx just increases by 1/x which is almost nothing at big values of x) f(x) clearly goes to -infinity as x tends to zero and the slope is zero at 1/2023 So clearly it has to cut the x axis at two points! lmk if you’re able to sketch the graph using this info, else i’ll send a detailed plot and steps actually, it’ll be just like lnx-x, just translated up by 2023 and decreasing a lot faster!!
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Oh, I forgot that linears overtake logarithms for large values. That's where I missed the point.
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
@πrate this is what the graph looks like on Desmos and Geogebra.
No description
No description
πrate
πrate7mo ago
aah don’t worry it’s not wrong
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Looks like x=1
πrate
πrate7mo ago
the part going towards -infinity is very close to zero try lnx-x +1 you agree that this and lnx -2023x +2023 will be the same? or is there any doubt only rate is different
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
No description
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Wait I'll zoom out to very large x
πrate
πrate7mo ago
yes
πrate
πrate7mo ago
No description
πrate
πrate7mo ago
the one in question is exactly like this, just very very steep
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Nvm I forgot to hit enter
πrate
πrate7mo ago
lol
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
No description
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Yeah I get it now, but during the exam, just how are we supposed to figure it out?
πrate
πrate7mo ago
the age old question 💀 it won’t magically hit you you’ll see it only after you’ve seen, analysed, plotted 1000s of functions! i only used this logic only to realise later that i’ve used this lol i realised after i typed the explanation
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Thanks for the help. I actually had another question I wanted to post in the server, but mind if I ask it here?
πrate
πrate7mo ago
that this is lnx-x only go on? i’ve to leave in 10-15 mins though
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
The answer is 8/π³ as per the key, but I couldn't solve it
No description
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Tried partial fractions, trigo identities, nothing worked From my limited experience, obtaining a telescoping series seems to be the way to go, but I can't seem to do it.
πrate
πrate7mo ago
i see looks a bit calculative, i’ll have to try it on pen and paper! will do after coming back
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
Alright, ping when you're done please
πrate
πrate7mo ago
certainly create a thread for it i might forget
Opt
OptOP7mo ago
I'll close this one. +solved @πrate @Deleted User
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892)
Time
<t:1720611650:R>
Solved by
<@408610503376764929> (408610503376764929), <@1221329740959318107> (1221329740959318107)

Did you find this page helpful?