electri

Q25 What is wrong with my approach? Abs is opt 3
No description
18 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Dexter
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Gamertug
GamertugOP10mo ago
No description
Cakey Bot
Cakey Bot10mo ago
iteachchem
Transcription requested by Aman | Jee 25
So, instead what you need to be doing to get M2 plus to M plus, that reaction, uske liye you have to use two half reactions to get the third half reaction. That process is a little bit messy in what you have done. You have to multiply NFE, right, so M2 plus reaction will go into 2, M2 plus is 0.153, that goes twice, that gets subtracted from M plus equation which is 0.53, so you get 0.224, can you try this out? That you add to 0.53 and you get 0.7 something is the answer.
Cakey Bot
Cakey Bot10mo ago
iteachchem
Transcription requested by Gamertug
Hey dude, by doing what you are doing, you are calculating M2 plus 2 M plus, you are not calculating the given equation, because remember E0 is intrinsic, it doesn't depend on number of particles, which is why tumhare sab 2 cancel out ho raha hai, but that being said, we need to calculate M2 plus 2 M plus and then add that directly to M plus 2 M, do you follow this?
Gamertug
GamertugOP10mo ago
Isn't this the req eqn. I Calc E0 for this , I don't understand
Gamertug
GamertugOP10mo ago
No description
Gamertug
GamertugOP10mo ago
Not all of it
Gamertug
GamertugOP10mo ago
I only understood the last part , still can't understand how that eqn is m2+ to m+
Gamertug
GamertugOP10mo ago
I understand now thx
iTeachChem
iTeachChem9mo ago
+fsolved
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1035556259417571408> (1035556259417571408)
Time
<t:1718990476:R>

Did you find this page helpful?