14 Replies
@Dexter
Note for OP
+solved @user to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the user who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.Nope. You need to have a chiral carbon to consider configurational isomers.
That's what I've learnt and I sincerely hope that's right.
Then why here it is asked to write R-S config In que (U) ?? It is optically inactive ig
iteachchem
Transcription requested by potato bhai
It is not on RS syllabus but solvents is really good with this.
The carbons are chiral.
Ahh..i got it
Tbf, if it's a Fischer projection, it's always chiral carbons that are at the + of the skeleton
So you don't have to check.
Got it thanks bro
No prob. Hope it was helpful.
It's also revision for me.
Oh i see actually im also revising this cause its coming in the test
+solved @Opt
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1035556259417571408> (1035556259417571408)
Time
<t:1718990846:R>
Solved by
<@763645886500175892> (763645886500175892)