I
iTeachChem10mo ago
Ricky

help krdo

Q1 and Q2
No description
37 Replies
iTeachChem Helper
@Apu
iTeachChem Helper
Note for OP
+solved @user to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the user who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.
Law of Reversibility
,rotate
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
No description
Comrade Rock Astley
Rearrange the terms You can write them as (31C1 - 31C2....) + 1/2 (31C2 +......) + 1/3 (31C3....) and so on Now we can reduce the series in each bracket into a usable term We have:
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Comrade Rock Astley
Now we'll simplify the series inside
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Comrade Rock Astley
Actually it's
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Maven
Maven10mo ago
Can you simplify it?...mere se v nhi hua..
Comrade Rock Astley
hold on We'll get there Ignore the -1 ^x part We'll simplify the series inside this So the best way to simplify this is to write this as a coefficient of x^k in some binomial expansion Firstly we'll add x terms to it
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Comrade Rock Astley
However this by itself cannot be used We need to multiply this by something so that the exponent of x is constant in the result
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Comrade Rock Astley
In this product we can find the coefficient of x^k In the product we'll have this term
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Comrade Rock Astley
Hence we get:
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Maven
Maven10mo ago
Please share written solution of yours...
Comrade Rock Astley
Hence we see that the product of x^k in (C_0-C_1x+C_2x^2...(-1)^n C_nx^n) \times (1+x+x^2...) is what we need ...yeah I'll put it in one doc hold on
Maven
Maven10mo ago
Okay
Maven
Maven10mo ago
Woah lemme try...and what about 2nd question
Ricky
RickyOP10mo ago
Thank you
Maven
Maven10mo ago
Did you find Q.no. 2 ka solution?
myst1cboomer
myst1cboomer10mo ago
you know the rules of double sigma?
Ricky
RickyOP10mo ago
I think we have to make the series and again relate with coefficient of some expansion,im trying
Comrade Rock Astley
Was out, just got back Did you get anything so far?
Comrade Rock Astley
Q2 looks symmetric at a glance Try proving this:
TeXit
TeXit10mo ago
Comrade Rock Astley
No description
Comrade Rock Astley
If you can prove this, then your answer is basically one step away Just recognise what this means and you'll easily get n
myst1cboomer
myst1cboomer10mo ago
keeping i term constant
Comrade Rock Astley
did you get it?
iTeachChem
iTeachChem9mo ago
Yo @Ricky ? all g ? +solved @Comrade Rock Astley
iTeachChem Helper
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1035556259417571408> (1035556259417571408)
Time
<t:1714529521:R>
Solved by
<@769492044837552139> (769492044837552139)

Did you find this page helpful?