53 Replies
@Dexter
Note for OP
+solved @user to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the user who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.3?
kaise?
Teeno cl waale?
huh???
bhai last ke 2 cl wale me chiral carbon kahaa hai?
🤧fir me nashe me hu pta nai kya concept laga Diya tha
1 hi hoga
Bhai kya diya hai answer?
3 honge bhai, 1 2 and 4
1 kaise? meso?
and 2 cos of upar neeche OH?
Sorry SorryðŸ˜
yaar
lekin
second compound me
bond line structure h
define kaise karoge
yea lol
scam
konsi config me hai
xD
agar dono side wale alcohol R and ek S me hua
toh enantio mer hai
optical active ban jaayega
+
is ke total 4 compounds banenge, 2 enantiomer and 2 meso
toh kuch bhi ho skta na
@iTeachChem kya hona chahiye fir
pehla toh fischer projection se inactive h cuz meso
second me kuch bhi ho skta
third column me ek hai cl wala chiral centre ke saath
answer should be 2 na?
can consider 2 from the middle one (ek OH wedge doosra dash, middle dash) next one - same but with OH wedge. That and 1 chloro wala?
so 3?
4 kyu? meso we dont count na
3 kaise
are haa
that middle oh
being wedge or dash
4 banenge total configs
gives 2, right?
jisme se 2 meso honge
how 4?
meso we dont count
yea
are wair
cos optically inactive
RRR = SSS (inactive)
RSR = SRS (inactive)
SSR = RRS (active)
RSS = SRR (active)
aise
@iTeachChem
iss question ka answer 2 hona chahiye na?
not sure! @Comrade Rock Astley any inputs?
Diya kitna hai ?
1
bas ye question sahi ho jaaye
ill cross my benchmark
abe 1 toh i said shuru me hi
xD
sirf cl wala hi toh hoga
baki cancels out
but aapne second wala ko consider nahi kiya tha
xD meso
second wala ho skta hai
KAHI NAHI LIKHA H USKA CONFIG
meso ho bhi skta h nahi bhi ho skta
xD
nta ki JAI
optical active ho bhi sakta hai, nahi bhi ho skta hai
im optimistic
so ho skta hai
ye sila mila mere optimism ko? @iTeachChem
ðŸ˜
innke aise harkaton ke baad hum gile shikhwe kaise na paalein
Me to vahi keh rha tha
Yep
Looks like it's 1
You could try this in your answer key challenge
In the end it really depends on what NTA thinks
it does give 1 vibe clearly
Even if you get a non-meso compound you'd have point symmetry about the central carbon I suppose
challengable i would say, should he go with it?
From molview it looks unsymmetric
You could add this as evidence and challenge it
but for this wedge dash is needed no?
it's one possible structure
is it like a stable conformer(also cool feature btw do you have more)
I'm not sure why molview shows that particular structure
I'm new to their website
+solve
+solved
You need to mention a member to mark the thread as solved.
+solved @user. This will be added to their stats.+solved @iTeachChem
Post locked and archived successfully!
Archived by
<@1170958401229041816> (1170958401229041816)
Time
<t:1713148486:R>
Solved by
<@1035556259417571408> (1035556259417571408)