shm bad implementation
with the feedback of gnif the dev of looking glass
the actual implementation on the
ujust setup-virtualization is not the good way he said to refer to this https://looking-glass.io/docs/B7-rc1/install_libvirt/#ivshmem because the actual is deprecated
ujust setup-virtualization is not the good way he said to refer to this https://looking-glass.io/docs/B7-rc1/install_libvirt/#ivshmem because the actual is deprecated
18 Replies
+1 👆
GitHub
feat: Looking glass shm OOB auto generation and support by HikariKn...
This adds the config for systemd to to generate the looking-glass shm file if libvirt requests it and also provide a just command to set the correct selinux file context for /dev/shm/looking-glass....
Universal Blue
Looking glass starting point
The KVMFR kernel module is not LG version specific, only the host and client application versions need to match. See: libvirt/QEMU Installation — Looking Glass B7-rc1 documentation Note I am referencing the B7-rc1 documentation as the KVMFR documentation has been improved substantially, the details here still apply to B6
@Kyle Gospo i will need your help with setting up a copr for the kernel module then so we could include it 👀
and a just file to toggle the acs patch :kappa:
the acs patch is more of a hackaround, idk if the fsync kernel dev would want it so he would have the last say in that
this was already included on some fsync version with the cmdline
Yeah that thing is a nightmare, I don't think it's going to be included
You were looking at a fork
harder like this?
https://github.com/xanmod/linux-patches/blob/master/linux-6.7.y-xanmod/pci_acso/0001-PCI-Enable-overrides-for-missing-ACS-capabilities.patch
xanmod do it at this way
GitHub
linux-patches/linux-6.7.y-xanmod/pci_acso/0001-PCI-Enable-overrides...
Contribute to xanmod/linux-patches development by creating an account on GitHub.
@Kyle Gospo thoughts on the kvmfr module though? think thats feasable since gnif confirmed it is not tied to the LG version the user uses.
i wouldnt mind maintaining the packaging for that kernel module since i would be using it myself (so i would need it to work for my job 🤣 )
Yeah, happy to help with that
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/johndekka-kernel-fsync/45816#:~:text=PCIe%20ACS%20Override%20patch seen to already included in the fsyn-kernel
Fedora Discussion
johndekka/kernel-fsync
Forked project is still being prepared for you. It may take a few minutes to duplicate backend data. Description If you don't want to fiddle to much with Fedora to fix its shortcomings you should try out Nobara Fedora kernel with these patches: cherry-picked Zen patches (patch, based on glitched-base by tkg) fs...
That is a fork
oh yes i havent seen