C#•6mo ago

✅ Can my Equals(IEnumerable<T>? x, IEnumerable<T>? y) be made much simpler?

You may have any tricks to simplify the following.

public bool Equals(IEnumerable<T>? x, IEnumerable<T>? y)
{
    if (x is null) return y is null;
    if (y is null) return false;
    return x.SequenceEqual(y);
}

public bool Equals(IEnumerable<T>? x, IEnumerable<T>? y)
{
    if (x is null) return y is null;
    if (y is null) return false;
    return x.SequenceEqual(y);
}

3 Replies

Thinker•6mo ago

You can turn this into a single boolean expression, but it's debatable whether it's any more readable.

(x is null && y is null) || (x is not null && y is not null && x.SequenceEqual(y))

(x is null && y is null) || (x is not null && y is not null && x.SequenceEqual(y))

Quest•6mo ago

absolutely disgusting but:

return (x, y) is (not null, not null) && x.SequenceEqual(y);

return (x, y) is (not null, not null) && x.SequenceEqual(y);

Thinker•6mo ago

That doesn't account for both being null Could be a switch expression tho

(x, y) switch
{
    (null, null) => true, 
    (not null, not null) => x.SequenceEqual(y), 
    _ => false
}

(x, y) switch
{
    (null, null) => true, 
    (not null, not null) => x.SequenceEqual(y), 
    _ => false
}

Gaming

Programming

✅ Can my Equals(IEnumerable<T>? x, IEnumerable<T>? y) be made much simpler?