Waistband height. Is it a personal preference or proportion thing?

No description
No description
No description
3 Replies
Nayyyyy
Nayyyyy13mo ago
Bit of both tbh Most rises/waistband height just follows macro fashion trends. So the average person hardly even thinks to have a preference It's just "how it is" Until it isn't Or there are more options Typical soundbite is higher rise = elongates legs visually and makes tucking in shirts easier as they don't ride up
jarmul22
jarmul2213mo ago
Higher rise also looks better when buttoning a sport coat
gimp
gimp13mo ago
The height of a waistband I think is kind of like the width of a lapel. Absurdly wide or super narrow are statements in a way. Standard height is just whatever matches your belts well. So dress pants you probably wear a 1-1.25" belt, so a 3" waistband would look off, and a 0.5" waistband wouldn't fit mechanically In general I think whatever doesn't make you go "huh, odd" is fine. Anything else, you're just having fun, which is fine too Formal pants tend to have a taller waistband ..... or it just looks that way without belt loops or side adjusters? Hmmm Minor variations I'm not sure you would even notice. I've never specified waistband height Hope that's useful. Maybe it isn't. Not my best ever answer haha
Want results from more Discord servers?
Add your server