Understanding the Compiler Optimization Flags
Here is a quick write up on the Compiler Optimization flags we use.
O0: The Bare Bones
At O0, the compiler’s role is straightforward: translate the source code into machine code with minimal intervention. This level avoids any changes that could alter the code’s behavior, making it an ideal setting for debugging.
O1: The Initial Enhancements
- Dead Code Elimination: Removing parts of the code that never execute.
- Basic Loop Optimization: Simplifying loops where the number of iterations is known beforehand.
- Function Inlining for Small Functions: Replacing function calls with the function's actual code when the function is small, reducing call overhead.
O2: The Performance Gear
O2 is where significant performance enhancements kick in, including:
- Advanced Loop Optimizations: Such as loop unrolling (expanding loops to reduce the number of iterations) and loop fusion (combining similar loops).
- Instruction Scheduling: Rearranging instructions to avoid CPU stalls and make better use of instruction pipelines.
- Constant Propagation: Replacing variables that act as constants with their actual values to reduce computation.
O3: Maximum Throttle
O3 extends O2 optimizations with a focus on speed, employing strategies like:
- Aggressive Loop Unrolling and Vectorization: Further enhancing loop processing efficiency by using vector operations.
- Cross-Module Inlining: Inlining functions across different modules or files.
- Advanced Instruction Scheduling: Further optimization for CPU pipeline efficiency.
Ofast: Breaking the Boundaries
Ofast disregards standard compliance for speed. It includes all O3 optimizations plus:
- Ignoring Strict Overflow Rules: This allows certain assumptions for integer overflows, which can speed up arithmetic operations but might lead to undefined behaviors.
- Fast Math Operations: Assumes associative and commutative properties in floating-point operations, which isn't always accurate but faster.
4 Replies
Os: The Size-Speed Balance
Os focuses on size efficiency while maintaining acceptable speed. It often includes:
- Moderate Loop Unrolling: To avoid excessive code size increase.
- Inline Function Limitation: Inlining is more selective to prevent code bloat.
- Discarding Unused Code: More aggressively than at O1 or O2.
Oz: Ultimate Size Reduction
Oz takes Os optimizations further, focusing intensely on reducing code size, including:
- Highly Selective Inlining: Only inlining where it's guaranteed to reduce size.
- Advanced Dead Code Elimination: Even more aggressive removal of unused code.
- Code Compaction Techniques: Like instruction merging, where possible.
What are some practical scenarios or use cases where optimizing for size (Os or Oz) would be particularly beneficial in software development? Looking forward to hear your thoughts
I personally used O2 - O3 in one of my project for parallelization.
As in O3, it does mention that it optmizes the code for pipelining efficiency, i used OpenACC in my code to parallelize few sections to run them on multicore. I couldn't verify if pipelining worked for this but could verify that the code was running parallely on multicore.
It's great that you utilized O2-O3 optimization flags in your project to enhance code performance. Combining OpenACC for parallelization on multicore architectures aligns well with optimizing for pipelining efficiency. While direct verification of pipelining might be challenging, observing parallel execution on multicore processors is a positive outcome.